These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18293099)

  • 1. Supererogation in clinical research.
    Barnbaum DR
    Med Health Care Philos; 2008 Sep; 11(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 18293099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Against the magnanimous in medical ethics.
    Kottow MH
    J Med Ethics; 1990 Sep; 16(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 2231634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supererogation and the profession of medicine.
    McKay AC
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 11934930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supererogation and altruism: a comment.
    Downie RS
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):75-6. PubMed ID: 11934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring and Expanding Supererogatory Acts: Beyond Duty for a Sustainable Future.
    White GRT; Samuel A; Thomas RJ
    J Bus Ethics; 2022 Jun; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 35789620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.
    Pollock K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 13():25. PubMed ID: 23016663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical Researchers' Ancillary Care Obligations: The Relationship-Based Approach.
    Olson NW
    Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 26424512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.
    Aita M; Richer MC
    Nurs Health Sci; 2005 Jun; 7(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 15877688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A theory of international bioethics: the negotiable and the non-negotiable.
    Baker R
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):233-73. PubMed ID: 11656933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kant's assessment of motivation in the fulfillment of social obligations.
    Knupp J
    Penn Bioeth J; 2006; 2(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 17146908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do Researchers in Empirical Ethics Studies Have a Duty to Act Upon their Findings? Case Study in End-of-Life Decision Making.
    Winkler EC
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Dec; 14(5):438-440. PubMed ID: 31779540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The views of ethics committee members and medical researchers on the return of individual research results and incidental findings, ownership issues and benefit sharing in biobanking research in a South Indian city.
    Vaz M; Vaz M; K S
    Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):321-330. PubMed ID: 28513968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism.
    Baker R
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):201-31. PubMed ID: 11656932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
    Fernandez CV; Weijer C
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical ethics versus clinical research.
    Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: disclosing individual results of genetic research.
    Manolio TA
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):32-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.
    Purvis RS; Long CR; Eisenberg LR; Hester DM; Cunningham TV; Holland A; Chatrathi HE; McElfish PA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):104-113. PubMed ID: 32163009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual use and the ethical responsibility of scientists.
    Ehni HJ
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 18512027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questioning the methodologic superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials.
    Howick J
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):34-48. PubMed ID: 19998192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives.
    Bunnik EM; van Bodegom L; Pinxten W; de Beaufort ID; Vernooij MW
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 28166795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.