These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18293602)

  • 1. [First clinical experiences with ceramic ball attachments for overdentures].
    Büttel AE; Schmidli F; Marinello CP; Lüthy H
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2008; 118(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 18293602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear of ceramic and titanium ball attachments in subjects with an implant-retained overdenture: a controlled clinical trial.
    Büttel AE; Lüthy H; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 22304745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Alsabeeha NH; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 21519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosthodontic maintenance of overdentures on zirconia implants: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Osman RB; Ma S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 25191890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear of ball attachments after 1 to 8 years of clinical use: a qualitative analysis.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Nader SA; Feine J; de Albuquerque RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 21519577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
    Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
    Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one-piece, direct metal laser sintering mini-implants: a short-term prospective clinical study.
    Mangano FG; Caprioglio A; Levrini L; Farronato D; Zecca PA; Mangano C
    J Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 86(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25272979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
    Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.