These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18293953)

  • 21. Fingerprint-based clustering applied to define a QSAR model use radius.
    Sprous DG
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Sep; 27(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 18556228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Database clustering with a combination of fingerprint and maximum common substructure methods.
    Stahl M; Mauser H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):542-8. PubMed ID: 15921444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shannon entropy-based fingerprint similarity search strategy.
    Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1687-91. PubMed ID: 19583222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Random reduction in fingerprint bit density improves compound recall in search calculations using complex reference molecules.
    Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jun; 71(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 18466274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A machine learning approach to weighting schemes in the data fusion of similarity coefficients.
    Chen J; Holliday J; Bradshaw J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 19434822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of data standardization on chemical clustering and similarity searching.
    Chu CW; Holliday JD; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Feb; 49(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 19434820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clustering files of chemical structures using the Székely-Rizzo generalization of Ward's method.
    Varin T; Bureau R; Mueller C; Willett P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Sep; 28(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 19640752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Molecular similarity searching using atom environments, information-based feature selection, and a naïve Bayesian classifier.
    Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 14741025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
    Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Filtering and counting of extended connectivity fingerprint features maximizes compound recall and the structural diversity of hits.
    Hu Y; Lounkine E; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Jul; 74(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 19519749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finding an appropriate equation to measure similarity between binary vectors: case studies on Indonesian and Japanese herbal medicines.
    Wijaya SH; Afendi FM; Batubara I; Darusman LK; Altaf-Ul-Amin M; Kanaya S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):520. PubMed ID: 27927171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Balancing the influence of molecular complexity on fingerprint similarity searching.
    Wang Y; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 18081268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.
    Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients.
    Chen X; Reynolds CH
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(6):1407-14. PubMed ID: 12444738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monte Carlo Tests of the Accuracy of Cluster Analysis Algorithms: A Comparison of Hierarchical and Nonhierarchical Methods.
    Scheibler D; Schneider W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1985 Jul; 20(3):283-304. PubMed ID: 26781967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relational Agreement Measures for Similarity Searching of Cheminformatic Data Sets.
    Rivera-Borroto OM; García-de la Vega JM; Marrero-Ponce Y; Grau R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2016; 13(1):158-67. PubMed ID: 26886740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of coefficients and distance measurements in passion fruit plants based on molecular markers and physicochemical descriptors.
    Cerqueira-Silva CB; Cardoso-Silva CB; Conceição LD; Nonato JV; Oliveira AC; Corrêa RX
    Genet Mol Res; 2009 Jul; 8(3):870-9. PubMed ID: 19731209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combination of fingerprint-based similarity coefficients using data fusion.
    Salim N; Holliday J; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):435-42. PubMed ID: 12653506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ccbmlib - a Python package for modeling Tanimoto similarity value distributions.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():. PubMed ID: 32161645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.