These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1829474)
1. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. Hirshman E; Mulligan N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 May; 17(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 1829474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests. Mulligan NW Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests. Mulligan NW Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Mulligan NW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory. von Hippel W; Hawkins C Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 7991350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Mulligan NW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1067-87. PubMed ID: 8805816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Ratcliff R; McKoon G; Verwoerd M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 2524543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data-driven and conceptually driven processes in partial-word identification and recognition. Hashtroudi S; Ferguson SA; Rappold VA; Chrosniak LD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):749-57. PubMed ID: 2972806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cerebral hemispheric differences in memory of emotional and non-emotional words in normal individuals. Nagae S; Moscovitch M Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1601-7. PubMed ID: 11985842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A reevaluation of semantic versus nonsemantic processing in implicit memory. Brown AS; Mitchell DB Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):533-41. PubMed ID: 7968549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity. LeCompte DC Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intention and awareness in perceptual identification priming. Richardson-Klavehn A; Lee MG; Joubran R; Bjork RA Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):293-312. PubMed ID: 8007833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence. Hughes RW; Jones DM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Backward masking and interference with the processing of brief visual displays. Di Lollo V; Lowe DG; Scott JP J Exp Psychol; 1974 Nov; 103(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 4443767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual distinctiveness and proactive interference in the primacy effect. Underwood G Q J Exp Psychol; 1975 May; 27(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 1187998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-lasting perceptual priming and semantic learning in amnesia: a case experiment. Tulving E; Hayman CA; Macdonald CA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jul; 17(4):595-617. PubMed ID: 1832430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "The mask who wasn't there": visual masking effect with the perceptual absence of the mask. Rey AE; Riou B; Muller D; Dabic S; Versace R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):567-73. PubMed ID: 25133514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences. Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]