117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1829474)
1. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing.
Hirshman E; Mulligan N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 May; 17(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 1829474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory.
von Hippel W; Hawkins C
Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 7991350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1067-87. PubMed ID: 8805816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.
Ratcliff R; McKoon G; Verwoerd M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 2524543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data-driven and conceptually driven processes in partial-word identification and recognition.
Hashtroudi S; Ferguson SA; Rappold VA; Chrosniak LD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):749-57. PubMed ID: 2972806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cerebral hemispheric differences in memory of emotional and non-emotional words in normal individuals.
Nagae S; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1601-7. PubMed ID: 11985842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interference in visual working memory.
McConnell J; Quinn JG
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 10718063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A reevaluation of semantic versus nonsemantic processing in implicit memory.
Brown AS; Mitchell DB
Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):533-41. PubMed ID: 7968549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Similarity effects in backward recognition masking.
Kallman HJ; Massaro DW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 528921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.
LeCompte DC
Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intention and awareness in perceptual identification priming.
Richardson-Klavehn A; Lee MG; Joubran R; Bjork RA
Mem Cognit; 1994 May; 22(3):293-312. PubMed ID: 8007833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
Hughes RW; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Backward masking and interference with the processing of brief visual displays.
Di Lollo V; Lowe DG; Scott JP
J Exp Psychol; 1974 Nov; 103(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 4443767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual distinctiveness and proactive interference in the primacy effect.
Underwood G
Q J Exp Psychol; 1975 May; 27(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 1187998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-lasting perceptual priming and semantic learning in amnesia: a case experiment.
Tulving E; Hayman CA; Macdonald CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jul; 17(4):595-617. PubMed ID: 1832430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "The mask who wasn't there": visual masking effect with the perceptual absence of the mask.
Rey AE; Riou B; Muller D; Dabic S; Versace R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):567-73. PubMed ID: 25133514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
