These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1829474)

  • 61. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Recovery of cognitive function soon after stroke: a study of visual neglect, attention span and verbal recall.
    Wade DT; Wood VA; Hewer RL
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1988 Jan; 51(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3351509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The role of visual imagery in the retention of information from sentences.
    Drose GS; Allen GL
    J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jan; 121(1):37-60. PubMed ID: 8021631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Explicit memory, repetition priming and cognitive skill learning in schizophrenia.
    Gras-Vincendon A; Danion JM; Grangé D; Bilik M; Willard-Schroeder D; Sichel JP; Singer L
    Schizophr Res; 1994 Sep; 13(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 7986768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. On the sources of forgetting in working memory: The test of competing hypotheses.
    Barrouillet P; Uittenhove K; Lucidi A; Langerock N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1714-1733. PubMed ID: 28726552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall.
    Isingrini M; Vazou F; Leroy P
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 7666759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Specificity of auditory implicit and explicit memory: is perceptual priming for environmental sounds exemplar specific?
    Chiu CY
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1126-39. PubMed ID: 11126936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Imagery and modality in sentence acquisition by adult males and females.
    Whitbourne SK; Manzi P; Cody J
    J Genet Psychol; 1983 Jun; 142(2d Half):181-7. PubMed ID: 6875524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Dynamics of visual recognition revealed by fMRI.
    Carlson T; Grol MJ; Verstraten FA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):892-905. PubMed ID: 16781872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. How color enhances visual memory for natural scenes.
    Spence I; Wong P; Rusan M; Rastegar N
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16371136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Selective visual interference with right hemisphere performance in verbal recall. A divided field study.
    Spinnler H; Sterzi R; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 6462428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Generation and context memory.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP; Rosner ZA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):836-46. PubMed ID: 16822151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory?
    Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Michod KO
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 17306854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Conceptual masking: how one picture captures attention from another picture.
    Loftus GR; Hanna AM; Lester L
    Cogn Psychol; 1988 Apr; 20(2):237-82. PubMed ID: 3365940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Autistics' Atypical Joint Attention: Policy Implications and Empirical Nuance.
    Gernsbacher MA; Stevenson JL; Khandakar S; Goldsmith HH
    Child Dev Perspect; 2008 Apr; 2(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 25404951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The attentional boost effect and perceptual degradation: Assessing the influence of attention on recognition memory.
    LaPointe MRP; Rosner TM; Ortiz-Tudela J; Lorentz L; Milliken B
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1024498. PubMed ID: 36467217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font.
    Cui L; Liu J
    Vision (Basel); 2022 Aug; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 36136745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Parametric Cognitive Load Reveals Hidden Costs in the Neural Processing of Perfectly Intelligible Degraded Speech.
    Ritz H; Wild CJ; Johnsrude IS
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 42(23):4619-4628. PubMed ID: 35508382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect.
    Chang M; Brainerd CJ
    Metacogn Learn; 2022; 17(2):443-476. PubMed ID: 35250403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Independent subsequent memory effects of conflict resolution and response inhibition.
    Chiu YC; Sun F; Dietz GA
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jul; 86(5):1565-1577. PubMed ID: 34386842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.