BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18295275)

  • 1. Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach.
    Henry GD; Graham SM; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Flynn B
    J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1475-9; discussion 1479. PubMed ID: 18295275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicenter study on the perineal versus penoscrotal approach for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: cuff size and control of male stress urinary incontinence.
    Henry GD; Graham SM; Cornell RJ; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Vakalopoulos I; Flynn B
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2404-9. PubMed ID: 19762042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the penoscrotal approach inferior to the perineal approach for artificial sphincter implantation in male urinary incontinence? A preliminary experience.
    Shen YC; Chiang PH
    Int J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):786-9. PubMed ID: 22494163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomical and manometric comparison of perineal and transscrotal approaches to artificial urinary sphincter placement.
    Anusionwu I; Miles-Thomas J; Hernandez DJ; Wright EJ
    J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1834-6. PubMed ID: 22999695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results.
    Magera JS; Elliott DS
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1015-9; discussion 1019-20. PubMed ID: 17296400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach: G. D. Henry, S. M. Graham, M. A. Cleves, C. J. Simmons and B. Flynn J Urol 2008; 179: 1475-1479.
    Siegel A
    J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):417; author reply 417-8. PubMed ID: 19019394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter implantation: can the penoscrotal approach constitute an alternative to the perineal approach?].
    Fassi-Fehri H; Dinia EM; Genevoix S; Murat FJ; Poissonnier L; Badet L; Colombel M; Martin X; Gelet A
    Prog Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18472073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation by a single surgeon in 15 years.
    Shen YC; Chiang PH
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2013 Mar; 29(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 23465419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of penile and bulbospongiosus measurements: implications for artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement.
    Schlomer BJ; Dugi DD; Valadez C; Morey AF
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1474-8. PubMed ID: 20171696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincter.
    Kabalin JN
    J Urol; 1996 Oct; 156(4):1302-4. PubMed ID: 8808859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
    Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ectopic placement of AMS 800 urinary control system pressure-regulating balloon.
    Wilson SK; Delk JR
    Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):167-70. PubMed ID: 15667886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
    Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the penoscrotal approach to artificial urinary sphincter surgery: how does it compare to a perineal incision for initial implantation?
    Staniorski CJ; Singal A; Nettey O; Yura E; Keeter MK; Kielb S; Hofer MD
    World J Urol; 2021 Mar; 39(3):871-876. PubMed ID: 32440696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence.
    Hudak SJ; Morey AF
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1962-6. PubMed ID: 21944140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions.
    Trost L; Elliott D
    Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.
    O'Connor RC; Lyon MB; Guralnick ML; Bales GT
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 18242372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Artificial sphincter in severe urinary incontinence: 9 years of experience].
    Batista Miranda JE; Arañó Bertrán P; Errando Smet C
    Arch Esp Urol; 2000 Jun; 53(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10961004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of cuff erosion of the double cuff artificial urinary sphincter.
    Bell BB; Mulcahy JJ
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 10604320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New enhancements of the scrotal one-incision technique for placement of artificial urinary sphincter allow proximal cuff placement.
    Wilson SK; Aliotta PJ; Salem EA; Mulcahy JJ
    J Sex Med; 2010 Oct; 7(10):3510-5. PubMed ID: 20584110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.