These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Enns JT Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1321-31. PubMed ID: 15066393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing. Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed offset of distracters masks a local target. Luiga I; Gellatly A; Bachmann T Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 20413101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contributions of lateral inhibition to object substitution masking and attention. Bridgeman B Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4075-82. PubMed ID: 17007902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metacontrast masking is specific to luminance polarity. Becker MW; Anstis S Vision Res; 2004; 44(21):2537-43. PubMed ID: 15358088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance. Cole GG; Kuhn G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of contrast polarity in paracontrast masking. Kafaligönül H; Breitmeyer BG; Ogmen H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1576-87. PubMed ID: 19801617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metacontrast masking of target-area internal contours and target overall surface brightness: the case of mutually coherent and incoherent visual objects. Bachmann T Spat Vis; 2009; 22(2):127-46. PubMed ID: 19228454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How the global layout of the mask influences masking strength. Ghose T; Hermens F; Herzog MH J Vis; 2012 Dec; 12(13):9. PubMed ID: 23232338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning. Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the strength of a mask in visual metacontrast masking? Duangudom V; Francis G; Herzog MH J Vis; 2007 Jan; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 17461675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Hirose N; Kihara K; Mima T; Ueki Y; Fukuyama H; Osaka N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1495-503. PubMed ID: 18085959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asymmetry in object substitution masking occurs relative to the direction of spatial attention shift. Hirose N; Osaka N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 20121293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]