BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18295425)

  • 1. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
    Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
    Munot K; Dall B; Achuthan R; Parkin G; Lane S; Horgan K
    Br J Surg; 2002 Oct; 89(10):1296-301. PubMed ID: 12296901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination.
    Sadowski EA; Kelcz F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 15834907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters.
    Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Matsushima S; Fukuda K
    Radiat Med; 2005 Feb; 23(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15786751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Imaging methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):160-72. PubMed ID: 7496112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast.
    Ahmed R; Ali SM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women.
    Liberman L; Morris EA; Benton CL; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
    Cancer; 2003 Jul; 98(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 12872360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [MR mammography: current status and indications].
    Umschaden HW; Haselbach H
    Acta Med Austriaca; 1997; 24(2):39-45. PubMed ID: 9273806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudo-angiomatous stromal hyperplasia presenting as a breast mass: imaging findings in three patients.
    Salvador R; Lirola JL; Domínguez R; López M; Risueño N
    Breast; 2004 Oct; 13(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 15454202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ability of subtraction and dynamic MR imaging to detect breast tumors: comparison with ultrasonography and mammography].
    Terao E; Takeuchi H; Iwamura A; Murakami Y; Harada J; Tada S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 54(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 7971186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum intensity projection analysis in magnetic resonance of the breast.
    Carriero A; Di Credico A; Mansour M; Bonomo L
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):77-81. PubMed ID: 12585659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [MR mammography].
    Kaiser WA
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 8390704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Magnetic resonance versus traditional breast imaging in solid nodular diseases of the breast].
    Ercolani P; Giuseppetti GM; Greco A; Manna P; Baldassarre S; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):36-40. PubMed ID: 8128030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
    Tardivon A; Meunier M; El Khoury C; Thibault F
    J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):381-6. PubMed ID: 12759651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radial scar: from conventional imaging to the new techniques. Case reports.
    Canadè A; Costantini M; Magistrelli A; Belli P; Pastore G
    Rays; 2002; 27(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 12696295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problem solving MR imaging of the breast.
    Lee CH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):919-34, vii. PubMed ID: 15337425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
    Belli P; Pastore G; Romani M; Terribile D; Canadè A; Costantini M
    Rays; 2002; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.