263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18295454)
21. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reasons for mini-implants failure: choosing installation site should be valued!
Consolaro A; Romano FL
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):18-24. PubMed ID: 24945511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Lim WH; Lee SK; Wikesjö UM; Chun YS
Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):760-5. PubMed ID: 17584877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone.
Motoyoshi M; Inaba M; Ono A; Ueno S; Shimizu N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 18963818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.
Motoyoshi M
J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 22167023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.
Kim HJ; Yun HS; Park HD; Kim DH; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 16905061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
Silvestrini Biavati A; Tecco S; Migliorati M; Festa F; Panza G; Marzo G; Gherlone E; Tetè S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial.
Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Liu S; Roberts E; Neace WP; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 22554747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary alveolar cortical bone thickness and density using computed tomography imaging.
Ohiomoba H; Sonis A; Yansane A; Friedland B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 28024789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of the cortical bone thickness by CT-scan and its association with orthodontic implant position in a young adult Eastern Mediterranean population: A cross sectional study.
Al-Hafidh NN; Al-Khatib AR; Al-Hafidh NN
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 32147328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio AM; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Perillo L; Matarese G; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement.
Lee KJ; Joo E; Kim KD; Lee JS; Park YC; Yu HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19361735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
Romano FL; Consolaro A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bone density effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee MY; Park JH; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Cho JW; Chang NY; Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26827978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Age-related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement.
Sathapana S; Forrest A; Monsour P; Naser-ud-Din S
Aust Dent J; 2013 Mar; 58(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 23441794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
