These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18296985)

  • 21. Reliability and concurrent validity of Futrex and bioelectrical impedance.
    Vehrs P; Morrow JR; Butte N
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Nov; 19(8):560-6. PubMed ID: 9877148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of leg-to-leg BIA in assessing body composition in high-school-aged males and females.
    Unick JL; Utter AC; Schumm S; McInnis T
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(4):301-13. PubMed ID: 17214406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity of leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance measurement in highly active women.
    Civar S; Aktop A; Tercan E; Ozdol Y; Ozer K
    J Strength Cond Res; 2006 May; 20(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 16686564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of air displacement for assessing body composition of collegiate wrestlers.
    Utter AC; Goss FL; Swan PD; Harris GS; Robertson RJ; Trone GA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Mar; 35(3):500-5. PubMed ID: 12618582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of bioelectrical impedance to assess body composition changes at high altitude.
    Fulco CS; Hoyt RW; Baker-Fulco CJ; Gonzalez J; Cymerman A
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1992 Jun; 72(6):2181-7. PubMed ID: 1629071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance and Skinfold Calipers for Measuring Body Composition in NOLS Backcountry Hikers.
    Boughman JK; Masters MA; Morgan CA; Ruden TM; Rochelle SG
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Dec; 30(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 31495771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The validity of visual estimations of percent body fat in lean males.
    Eckerson JM; Housh TJ; Johnson GO
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 May; 24(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 1569858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can bioelectric impedance monitors be used to accurately estimate body fat in Chinese adults?
    Macfarlane DJ
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17215182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparisons of fatness indicators in Budapest children.
    Németh A; Bodzsár EB; Eiben OG
    Anthropol Anz; 1999 Dec; 57(4):325-37. PubMed ID: 10676569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of body compositional indices assessed by underwater weighing, bioelectrical impedance and anthropometry in Indonesian adolescent girls.
    Isjwara RI; Lukito W; Schultink JW
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(4):641-8. PubMed ID: 18042523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of fat mass and skeletal muscle mass estimation in male ultra-endurance athletes using bioelectrical impedance analysis and different anthropometric methods.
    Knechtle B; Wirth A; Knechtle P; Rosemann T; Rüst CA; Bescós R
    Nutr Hosp; 2011; 26(6):1420-7. PubMed ID: 22411391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Agreement between skinfold-predicted percent fat and percent fat from whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis in children and adolescents.
    Rowe DA; Dubose KD; Donnelly JE; Mahar MT
    Int J Pediatr Obes; 2006; 1(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 17899635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis to hydrostatic weighing in male body builders.
    Volpe SL; Melanson EL; Kline G
    Acta Diabetol; 2010 Mar; 47(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19219400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of field methods in assessing body fat in collegiate baseball players.
    Loenneke JP; Wray ME; Wilson JM; Barnes JT; Kearney ML; Pujol TJ
    Res Sports Med; 2013; 21(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 23777383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of body composition measurement techniques.
    Hillier SE; Beck L; Petropoulou A; Clegg ME
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Dec; 27(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 24387134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity of skinfold estimates of percent fat in high school female gymnasts.
    Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Housh DJ; Eckerson JM; Stout JR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1996 Oct; 28(10):1331-5. PubMed ID: 8897393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of bipolar and tetrapolar impedance techniques for assessing fat mass.
    Dittmar M
    Am J Hum Biol; 2004; 16(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 15368607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Percent body fat estimations in college women using field and laboratory methods: a three-compartment model approach.
    Moon JR; Hull HR; Tobkin SE; Teramoto M; Karabulut M; Roberts MD; Ryan ED; Kim SJ; Dalbo VJ; Walter AA; Smith AT; Cramer JT; Stout JR
    J Int Soc Sports Nutr; 2007 Nov; 4():16. PubMed ID: 17988393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
    Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
    Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Fat content in young adults determined by skinfolds and body composition analyzator].
    Kęska A; Tkaczyk J; Czajkowska A; Wiśniewski A; Norkowski H; Smolarczyk M; Kapuściński P
    Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab; 2012; 18(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 22525689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.