BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18297268)

  • 1. Tight glycaemic control by an automated algorithm with time-variant sampling in medical ICU patients.
    Pachler C; Plank J; Weinhandl H; Chassin LJ; Wilinska ME; Kulnik R; Kaufmann P; Smolle KH; Pilger E; Pieber TR; Ellmerer M; Hovorka R
    Intensive Care Med; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1224-30. PubMed ID: 18297268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hospital glucose control: safe and reliable glycemic control using enhanced model predictive control algorithm in medical intensive care unit patients.
    Amrein K; Ellmerer M; Hovorka R; Kachel N; Parcz D; Korsatko S; Smolle K; Perl S; Bock G; Doll W; Köhler G; Pieber TR; Plank J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 May; 12(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 20388051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blood glucose control by a model predictive control algorithm with variable sampling rate versus a routine glucose management protocol in cardiac surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hovorka R; Kremen J; Blaha J; Matias M; Anderlova K; Bosanska L; Roubicek T; Wilinska ME; Chassin LJ; Svacina S; Haluzik M
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2007 Aug; 92(8):2960-4. PubMed ID: 17550955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensive insulin therapy: enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm versus standard care.
    Cordingley JJ; Vlasselaers D; Dormand NC; Wouters PJ; Squire SD; Chassin LJ; Wilinska ME; Morgan CJ; Hovorka R; Van den Berghe G
    Intensive Care Med; 2009 Jan; 35(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 18661120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Software-guided insulin dosing: tight glycemic control and decreased glycemic derangements in critically ill patients.
    Saur NM; Kongable GL; Holewinski S; O'Brien K; Nasraway SA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Sep; 88(9):920-9. PubMed ID: 24001484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Space GlucoseControl system for blood glucose control in intensive care patients--a European multicentre observational study.
    Blaha J; Barteczko-Grajek B; Berezowicz P; Charvat J; Chvojka J; Grau T; Holmgren J; Jaschinski U; Kopecky P; Manak J; Moehl M; Paddle J; Pasculli M; Petersson J; Petros S; Radrizzani D; Singh V; Starkopf J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Jan; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26801983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three protocols for tight glycemic control in cardiac surgery patients.
    Blaha J; Kopecky P; Matias M; Hovorka R; Kunstyr J; Kotulak T; Lips M; Rubes D; Stritesky M; Lindner J; Semrad M; Haluzik M
    Diabetes Care; 2009 May; 32(5):757-61. PubMed ID: 19196894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms.
    Van Herpe T; De Brabanter J; Beullens M; De Moor B; Van den Berghe G
    Crit Care; 2008; 12(1):R24. PubMed ID: 18302732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of continuous glucose monitoring combined with computer-based eMPC algorithm for tight glucose control in cardiosurgical ICU.
    Kopecký P; Mráz M; Bláha J; Lindner J; Svačina S; Hovorka R; Haluzík M
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():186439. PubMed ID: 23555075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study.
    Xu B; Jiang W; Wang CY; Weng L; Hu XY; Peng JM; Du B
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Sep; 130(17):2041-2049. PubMed ID: 28836546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pilot study to evaluate blood glucose control by a model predictive control algorithm with variable sampling rate vs. routine glucose management protocol in peri- and postoperative period in cardiac surgery patients].
    Roubícek T; Kremen J; Bláha J; Matias M; Kopecký P; Rulísek J; Anderlová K; Bosanská L; Mráz M; Chassin LJ; Hovorka R; Svacina S; Haluzík M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2007; 146(11):868-73. PubMed ID: 18069214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled trial comparing a computer-assisted insulin infusion protocol with a strict and a conventional protocol for glucose control in critically ill patients.
    Cavalcanti AB; Silva E; Pereira AJ; Caldeira-Filho M; Almeida FP; Westphal GA; Beims R; Fernandes CC; Correa TD; Gouvea MR; Eluf-Neto J
    J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 24(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 19592202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Software-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control in critically ill patients: the LOGIC-2 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Dubois J; Van Herpe T; van Hooijdonk RT; Wouters R; Coart D; Wouters P; Van Assche A; Veraghtert G; De Moor B; Wauters J; Wilmer A; Schultz MJ; Van den Berghe G; Mesotten D
    Crit Care; 2017 Aug; 21(1):212. PubMed ID: 28806982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation and evaluation of the SPRINT protocol for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: a clinical practice change.
    Chase JG; Shaw G; Le Compte A; Lonergan T; Willacy M; Wong XW; Lin J; Lotz T; Lee D; Hann C
    Crit Care; 2008; 12(2):R49. PubMed ID: 18412978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of tight intraoperative glycemic control during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.
    Lecomte P; Foubert L; Coddens J; Dewulf B; Nobels F; Casselman F; Cammu G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):937-42. PubMed ID: 21640613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating glycemic control algorithms by computer simulations.
    Wilinska ME; Blaha J; Chassin LJ; Cordingley JJ; Dormand NC; Ellmerer M; Haluzik M; Plank J; Vlasselaers D; Wouters PJ; Hovorka R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jul; 13(7):713-22. PubMed ID: 21488803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison study of continuous insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit: computer-guided vs. standard column-based algorithms.
    Newton CA; Smiley D; Bode BW; Kitabchi AE; Davidson PC; Jacobs S; Steed RD; Stentz F; Peng L; Mulligan P; Freire AX; Temponi A; Umpierrez GE
    J Hosp Med; 2010 Oct; 5(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 20945468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-assisted glucose control in critically ill patients.
    Vogelzang M; Loef BG; Regtien JG; van der Horst IC; van Assen H; Zijlstra F; Nijsten MW
    Intensive Care Med; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1421-7. PubMed ID: 18389221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective evaluation of a dynamic insulin infusion algorithm for non critically-ill diabetic patients: A before-after study.
    Montanier N; Bernard L; Lambert C; Pereira B; Desbiez F; Terral D; Abergel A; Bohatier J; Rosset E; Schmidt J; Sautou V; Hadjadj S; Batisse-Lignier M; Tauveron I; Maqdasy S; Roche B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211425. PubMed ID: 30689675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. USE OF A COMPUTER-GUIDED GLUCOSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND ADDRESS NATIONAL QUALITY MEASURES: A 7-YEAR, RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.
    Tanenberg RJ; Hardee S; Rothermel C; Drake AJ
    Endocr Pract; 2017 Mar; 23(3):331-341. PubMed ID: 27967226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.