157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18297299)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.
Vincent C; Ruzza I; Vaneecloo FM; Dubrulle F
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 18297299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects.
Teissl C; Kremser C; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 9(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 10030647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T.
Youssefzadeh S; Baumgartner W; Dorffner R; Gstöttner W; Trattnig S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 9606372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The Safety of MR Conditional Cochlear Implant at 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging System].
Takahashi D; Ogura A; Hayashi N; Seino S; Kawai R; Matsuda T; Doi T; Tsuchihashi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Aug; 72(8):674-80. PubMed ID: 27546081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.
Dubrulle F; Sufana Iancu A; Vincent C; Tourrel G; Ernst O
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1510-8. PubMed ID: 23300043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.
Heller JW; Brackmann DE; Tucci DL; Nyenhuis JA; Chou CK
Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 8892568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.
Tysome JR; Tam YC; Patterson I; Graves MJ; Gazibegovic D
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Dec; 40(10):e966-e974. PubMed ID: 31524762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear Implant Magnet Dislocation: Simulations and Measurements of Force and Torque at 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Eerkens HJ; Smits C; Hofman MBM
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 33657576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Nuclear magnetic resonance and cochlear implant].
Ouayoun M; Dupuch K; Aitbenamou C; Chouard CH
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1997; 114(3):65-70. PubMed ID: 9295883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging.
Berry JM; Tansey JB; Wu L; Choudhri A; Yawn RJ; MacDonald CB; Richard C
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38260952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
Gubbels SP; McMenomey SO
Laryngoscope; 2006 Jun; 116(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 16735911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pain Free 3 T MRI Scans in Cochlear Implantees.
Todt I; Tittel A; Ernst A; Mittmann P; Mutze S
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e401-e404. PubMed ID: 28938274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI-induced artifact by a cochlear implant with a novel magnet system: an experimental cadaver study.
Canzi P; Aprile F; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Magnetto M; Lafe E; Minervini D; Avato I; Terrani S; Scribante A; Gazibegovic D; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3753-3762. PubMed ID: 33206227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Associated With Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants: Cholesteatoma and Vestibular Schwannoma Surveillance.
Nassiri AM; Messina SA; Benson JC; Lane JI; McGee KP; Trzasko JD; Carlson ML
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 37582349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Wagner J; Mutze S; Ernst A
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):972-6. PubMed ID: 25634466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system.
Canzi P; Magnetto M; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Aprile F; Lafe E; Carlotto E; Avato I; Scribante A; Preda L; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):2889-2898. PubMed ID: 34370074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
