97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18297506)
1. Customization of a generic 3D model of the distal femur using diagnostic radiographs.
Schmutz B; Reynolds KJ; Slavotinek JP
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 18297506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of a generic 3D model of the distal femur.
Schmutz B; Reynolds KJ; Slavotinek JP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Oct; 9(5):305-12. PubMed ID: 17132616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to reconstruct patient-specific proximal femur surface models from planar pre-operative radiographs.
Galibarov PE; Prendergast PJ; Lennon AB
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Dec; 32(10):1180-8. PubMed ID: 20933453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours: application to the distal femur.
Laporte S; Skalli W; de Guise JA; Lavaste F; Mitton D
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12623432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical evaluation and stress distribution of intact canine femur.
Verim O; Tasgetiren S; Er MS; Ozdemir V; Yuran AF
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Mar; 9(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22987569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing parametric solid modelling/reconfiguration, global shape modelling and free-form deformation for the generation of 3D digital models of femurs from X-ray images.
Filippi S; Motyl B; Bandera C
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 18651260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiograph-based femur morphing method.
Zanetti EM; Crupi V; Bignardi C; Calderale PM
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Mar; 43(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 15865125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D reconstruction of a patient-specific surface model of the proximal femur from calibrated x-ray radiographs: a validation study.
Zheng G; Schumann S
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1155-66. PubMed ID: 19472621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parametric subject-specific model for in vivo 3D reconstruction using bi-planar X-rays: application to the upper femoral extremity.
Baudoin A; Skalli W; de Guise JA; Mitton D
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Aug; 46(8):799-805. PubMed ID: 18543013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur.
Mahfouz MR; Merkl BC; Fatah EE; Booth R; Argenson JN
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Dec; 10(6):447-56. PubMed ID: 17891677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided methods for assessing lower limb deformities in orthopaedic surgery planning.
Subburaj K; Ravi B; Agarwal M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 19963346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical comparison and evaluation of human proximal femurs modeling via different devices and FEM analysis.
Verim Ö; Taşgetiren S; Er MS; Timur M; Yuran AF
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22711421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic extraction of proximal femur contours from calibrated X-ray images using 3D statistical models: an in vitro study.
Dong X; Zheng G
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 19343704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pose-invariant 3D proximal femur estimation through bi-planar image segmentation with hierarchical higher-order graph-based priors.
Wang C; Boussaid H; Simon L; Lazennec JY; Paragios N
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 3):346-53. PubMed ID: 22003718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A new method to reconstruct the spatial structure of human proximal femur and establishment of the finite element model].
Ma X; Fu X; Ma J; Zhao Y; Wang T; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Dong B; Yang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 21485187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of the accuracy of MRI generated 3D models of long bones compared to CT generated 3D models.
Rathnayaka K; Momot KI; Noser H; Volp A; Schuetz MA; Sahama T; Schmutz B
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 21855392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D reconstruction of the proximal femur with low-dose digital stereoradiography.
Le Bras A; Laporte S; Bousson V; Mitton D; De Guise JA; Laredo JD; Skalli W
Comput Aided Surg; 2004; 9(3):51-7. PubMed ID: 15792937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femur shape prediction by multiple regression based on quadric surface fitting.
Sholukha V; Chapman T; Salvia P; Moiseev F; Euran F; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):712-8. PubMed ID: 21122862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer system for definition of the quantitative geometry of musculature from CT images.
Daniel M; Iglic A; Kralj-Iglic V; Konvicková S
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2005 Feb; 8(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 16154867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D reconstruction of the pelvis from bi-planar radiography.
Mitton D; Deschênes S; Laporte S; Godbout B; Bertrand S; de Guise JA; Skalli W
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16880151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
