227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18298205)
1. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
Kerr WJ; Ford I
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Craniofacial morphology in children with Angle Class II-1 malocclusion with and without deepbite.
Karlsen AT
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):437-46. PubMed ID: 7864465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glenoid fossa position in surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
Sundareswaran S; Nipun CA
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 25351572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cranial base angulation in Brazilian patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
Alves PV; Mazuchelli J; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 18362708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
Murata S
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental and skeletal outcomes for Class II surgical-orthodontic treatment: A comparison between novice and experienced clinicians.
Potts B; Fields HW; Shanker S; Vig KW; Beck FM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 21392684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion.
Innocenti C; Giuntini V; Defraia E; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 19361728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion?
Rosenblum RE
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 7726463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
