348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18298206)
1. Molar changes with cervical headgear alone or in combination with rapid maxillary expansion.
Marchiori Farret M; de Lima EM; Pereira Araújo V; Deon Rizzatto SM; Macedo de Menezes L; Lima Grossi M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):847-51. PubMed ID: 18298206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long- and short-term effects of headgear traction with and without the maxillary second molars.
Shpack N; Brosh T; Mazor Y; Shapinko Y; Davidovitch M; Sarig R; Reimann S; Bourauel C; Vardimon AD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 25263150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures.
Toy E; Enacar A
Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21696108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Bondemark L; Karlsson I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental and skeletal effects of combined headgear used alone or in association with rapid maxillary expansion.
Farret MM; Lima EM; Farret MM; Araújo LL
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):43-9. PubMed ID: 26560820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
Varlik SK; Iscan HN
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.
Taner TU; Yukay F; Pehlivanoglu M; Cakirer B
Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 14719733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with slow and rapid maxillary expansion.
Lima Filho RM; Ruellas AC
Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):870-4. PubMed ID: 17685770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
