These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18298209)

  • 1. Porcelain refinishing with two different polishing systems after orthodontic debonding.
    Karan S; Toroglu MS
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):947-53. PubMed ID: 18298209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porcelain surface alterations and refinishing after use of two orthodontic bonding methods.
    Herion DT; Ferracane JL; Covell DA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 19852657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs to feldspathic porcelains.
    Samruajbenjakul B; Kukiattrakoon B
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 19413398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface conditioning methods and polishing techniques effect on surface roughness of a feldspar ceramic.
    Saraç YS; Elekdag-Turk S; Saraç D; Turk T
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):723-8. PubMed ID: 17605488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain.
    Bourke BM; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 10592155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
    Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of extraoral porcelain polishing sequences on surface roughness and color of feldspathic porcelain.
    Yuzugullu B; Celik C; Erkut S; Ozcelik TB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 20095196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces.
    Trakyali G; Malkondu O; Kazazoğlu E; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 19339674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the influence of gastric acid on the surface roughness of ceramic materials of metal-ceramic restorations. An in vitro study.
    Matsou E; Vouroutzis N; Kontonasaki E; Paraskevopoulos KM; Koidis P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 21209998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.
    Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the ceramic/ceramic interface.
    Zelos L; Bevis RR; Keenan KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 8017345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass-ceramic following different surface treatments.
    Pollington S; Fabianelli A; van Noort R
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):864-72. PubMed ID: 20542327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.