BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18298223)

  • 1. Early treatment with a maxillary lip bumper-bite plateau combination.
    Korn M; Melsen B
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):838-46. PubMed ID: 18298223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: a device to move molars distally.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 21490998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kook YA; Bayome M; Trang VT; Kim HJ; Park JH; Kim KB; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Uçem TT; Yüksel S; Okay C; Gülşen A
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 10920561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary sinus floor extension and posterior tooth inclination in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first molar extractions.
    Livas C; Halazonetis DJ; Booij JW; Pandis N; Tu YK; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 23561408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non extraction short-term arch changes.
    Ferro F; Perillo L; Ferro A
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5():18-43. PubMed ID: 15329745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of postretention stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances.
    Raucci G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Elyasi M; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 27654628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalization.
    Duran GS; Görgülü S; Dindaroğlu F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 27364220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances.
    Ciambotti C; Ngan P; Durkee M; Kohli K; Kim H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11174532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
    Waring DT; Pender N; Counihan D
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16429866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion.
    Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.
    Bondemark L; Thornéus J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 15898386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effect of maxillary and mandibular lip bumper on teeth and dental arch in late mixed dentition].
    Teng M; Sun F
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 16155695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation.
    Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 9267573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.