BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18299141)

  • 1. Perceptual objects capture attention.
    Yeshurun Y; Kimchi R; Sha'shoua G; Carmel T
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1329-35. PubMed ID: 18299141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual organization and visual attention.
    Kimchi R
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():15-33. PubMed ID: 19733747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual organization, visual attention, and objecthood.
    Kimchi R; Yeshurun Y; Spehar B; Pirkner Y
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():34-51. PubMed ID: 26440865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention delays perceived stimulus offset.
    Rolke B; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2926-33. PubMed ID: 16647741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
    Hommuk K; Bachmann T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood.
    Kimchi R; Yeshurun Y; Cohen-Savransky A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 17546748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
    Chen Z
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.
    Baldauf D; Deubel H
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):549-63. PubMed ID: 18206205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-based attention and visual area LO.
    de-Wit LH; Kentridge RW; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new object captures attention--but only when you know it's new.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 19429953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.
    Moores E; Laiti L; Chelazzi L
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 6(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12514738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic computation of an image's statistical surprise predicts performance of human observers on a natural image detection task.
    Mundhenk TN; Einhäuser W; Itti L
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1620-37. PubMed ID: 19351543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
    Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.