These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18299825)

  • 1. Analysis of membrane-localized binding kinetics with FRAP.
    Dushek O; Das R; Coombs D
    Eur Biophys J; 2008 Jun; 37(5):627-38. PubMed ID: 18299825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling.
    Sadegh Zadeh K; Montas HJ; Shirmohammadi A
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Oct; 3():36. PubMed ID: 17034642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Parameter Inference from FRAP Data: an Analysis Motivated by Pattern Formation in the Drosophila Wing Disc.
    Lin L; Othmer HG
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Mar; 79(3):448-497. PubMed ID: 28101740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FRAP analysis of membrane-associated proteins: lateral diffusion and membrane-cytoplasmic exchange.
    Goehring NW; Chowdhury D; Hyman AA; Grill SW
    Biophys J; 2010 Oct; 99(8):2443-52. PubMed ID: 20959084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.
    Kang M; Day CA; DiBenedetto E; Kenworthy AK
    Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):2737-47. PubMed ID: 21044570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameter estimation in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: quantitative analysis of protein binding reactions and diffusion.
    Williamson DE; Sahai E; Jenkins RP; O'Dea RD; King JR
    J Math Biol; 2021 Jun; 83(1):1. PubMed ID: 34129100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP.
    Tolentino TP; Wu J; Zarnitsyna VI; Fang Y; Dustin ML; Zhu C
    Biophys J; 2008 Jul; 95(2):920-30. PubMed ID: 18390627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inference of protein kinetics by stochastic modeling and simulation of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments.
    Rapsomaniki MA; Cinquemani E; Giakoumakis NN; Kotsantis P; Lygeros J; Lygerou Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25273108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate quantification of diffusion and binding kinetics of non-integral membrane proteins by FRAP.
    Berkovich R; Wolfenson H; Eisenberg S; Ehrlich M; Weiss M; Klafter J; Henis YI; Urbakh M
    Traffic; 2011 Nov; 12(11):1648-57. PubMed ID: 21810156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP): acquisition, analysis, and applications.
    Carnell M; Macmillan A; Whan R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1232():255-71. PubMed ID: 25331140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parameter Identifiability in PDE Models of Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching.
    Ciocanel MV; Ding L; Mastromatteo L; Reichheld S; Cabral S; Mowry K; Sandstede B
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 Mar; 86(4):36. PubMed ID: 38430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are assumptions about the model type necessary in reaction-diffusion modeling? A FRAP application.
    Mai J; Trump S; Ali R; Schiltz RL; Hager G; Hanke T; Lehmann I; Attinger S
    Biophys J; 2011 Mar; 100(5):1178-88. PubMed ID: 21354390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regression Analysis of Confocal FRAP and its Application to Diffusion in Membranes.
    Kang M
    J Fluoresc; 2022 May; 32(3):1031-1038. PubMed ID: 35254627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mathematical model of actin filament turnover for fitting FRAP data.
    Halavatyi AA; Nazarov PV; Al Tanoury Z; Apanasovich VV; Yatskou M; Friederich E
    Eur Biophys J; 2010 Mar; 39(4):669-77. PubMed ID: 19921173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A coupled diffusion-kinetics model for analysis of contact-area FRAP experiment.
    Wu J; Fang Y; Zarnitsyna VI; Tolentino TP; Dustin ML; Zhu C
    Biophys J; 2008 Jul; 95(2):910-9. PubMed ID: 18390628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferences from FRAP data are model dependent: A subdiffusive analysis.
    Alexander AM; Lawley SD
    Biophys J; 2022 Oct; 121(20):3795-3810. PubMed ID: 36127879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical Simulation and FRAP Experiments Show That the Plasma Membrane Binding Protein PH-EFA6 Does Not Exhibit Anomalous Subdiffusion in Cells.
    Favard C
    Biomolecules; 2018 Sep; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30189682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DeepFRAP: Fast fluorescence recovery after photobleaching data analysis using deep neural networks.
    Wåhlstrand Skärström V; Krona A; Lorén N; Röding M
    J Microsc; 2021 May; 282(2):146-161. PubMed ID: 33247838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A closed-form analytic expression for FRAP formula for the binding diffusion model.
    Kang M; Kenworthy AK
    Biophys J; 2008 Jul; 95(2):L13-5. PubMed ID: 18487305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mathematical model to determine molecular kinetic rate constants under non-steady state conditions using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).
    Lele TP; Ingber DE
    Biophys Chem; 2006 Mar; 120(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 16271824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.