These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18300928)

  • 1. Validity of the TIMPSI for estimating concurrent performance on the test of infant motor performance.
    Campbell SK; Swanlund A; Smith E; Liao PJ; Zawacki L
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2008; 20(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 18300928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance.
    Kolobe TH; Bulanda M; Susman L
    Phys Ther; 2004 Dec; 84(12):1144-56. PubMed ID: 15563255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.
    Campbell SK; Kolobe TH; Wright BD; Linacre JM
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2002 Apr; 44(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 11995895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive validity of the test of infant motor performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency at school age.
    Flegel J; Kolobe TH
    Phys Ther; 2002 Aug; 82(8):762-71. PubMed ID: 12147006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of motor and functional outcomes in infants born preterm assessed at term.
    Snider L; Majnemer A; Mazer B; Campbell S; Bos AF
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2009; 21(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19214070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III scales at 6 weeks corrected age.
    Campbell SK; Zawacki L; Rankin KM; Yoder JC; Shapiro N; Li Z; White-Traut R
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2013; 25(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 24081011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying premature infants at high and low risk for motor delays using motor performance testing and MRS.
    Coker-Bolt P; Woodbury ML; Perkel J; Moreau NG; Hope K; Brown T; Ramakrishnan V; Mulvihill D; Jenkins D
    J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 25260505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responsiveness of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in infants born preterm.
    Rose RU; Westcott SL
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2005; 17(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 16357676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.
    Tse L; Mayson TA; Leo S; Lee LL; Harris SR; Hayes VE; Backman CL; Cameron D; Tardif M
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2008 Feb; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 18207045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New reference values must be established for the Alberta Infant Motor Scales for accurate identification of infants at risk for motor developmental delay in Flanders.
    De Kegel A; Peersman W; Onderbeke K; Baetens T; Dhooge I; Van Waelvelde H
    Child Care Health Dev; 2013 Mar; 39(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 22676145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent validity in Taiwan of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers who were full-term infants.
    Liao HF; Yao G; Wang TM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 18986029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance.
    Campbell SK; Kolobe TH; Osten ET; Lenke M; Girolami GL
    Phys Ther; 1995 Jul; 75(7):585-96. PubMed ID: 7604077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of test of infant motor performance (TIMP) item responses among children with cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and typical development.
    Barbosa VM; Campbell SK; Smith E; Berbaum M
    Am J Occup Ther; 2005; 59(4):446-56. PubMed ID: 16124211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation and Reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for Brazilian Infants.
    Chiquetti EMDS; Valentini NC; Saccani R
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2020; 40(4):470-485. PubMed ID: 31928290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harris Infant Neuromotor Test: comparison of US and Canadian normative data and examination of concurrent validity with the Ages and Stages Questionnaire.
    Westcott McCoy S; Bowman A; Smith-Blockley J; Sanders K; Megens AM; Harris SR
    Phys Ther; 2009 Feb; 89(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 19131397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement between scales for screening and diagnosis of motor development at 6 months.
    Campos D; Santos DC; Gonçalves VM; Goto MM; Arias AV; Brianeze AC; Campos TM; Mello BB
    J Pediatr (Rio J); 2006; 82(6):470-4. PubMed ID: 17171207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem?
    Glascoe FP
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Jan; 155(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 11177063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motor development curve from 0 to 12 months in infants born preterm.
    Kayenne Martins Roberto Formiga C; Linhares MB
    Acta Paediatr; 2011 Mar; 100(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 20825603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-second edition for assessing motor development of low birth weight preterm infants.
    Tavasoli A; Azimi P; Montazari A
    Pediatr Neurol; 2014 Oct; 51(4):522-6. PubMed ID: 25266615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical bottom line. Prediction of motor and functional outcomes in infants born preterm assessed at term.
    Sargent B
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2009; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 19214071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.