These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18301760)
21. Tips for writing and publishing an article. Nahata MC Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors. Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Molenaar N; Bossuyt PM; Scholten RJ Neth J Med; 2014 Sep; 72(7):349-55. PubMed ID: 25178768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The reported training and experience of editors in chief of specialist clinical medical journals. Garrow J; Butterfield M; Marshall J; Williamson A JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):286-7. PubMed ID: 9676684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals. Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes. Bartus CL; Katz KA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine. Cortegiani A; Sanfilippo F; Tramarin J; Giarratano A J Crit Care; 2019 Apr; 50():247-249. PubMed ID: 30622041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Qi X; Deng H; Guo X Postgrad Med J; 2017 Aug; 93(1102):499-503. PubMed ID: 27663911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers. Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors. Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Journal Publishing: A Review of the Basics. Kennedy MS Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):361-371. PubMed ID: 30266551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal. Grant MJ Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions. Barroga EF J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1587-9. PubMed ID: 25469055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study. Glonti K; Hren D BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability. Green SM; Callaham ML Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Getting published well requires fulfilling editors' and reviewers' needs and desires. Schoenwolf GC Dev Growth Differ; 2013 Dec; 55(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 24131034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]