BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18301908)

  • 1. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
    Wagner W; Plinkert PK; Vonthein R; Plontke SK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Growth in Aging Ears with Clinically Normal Behavioral Thresholds.
    Glavin CC; Siegel J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):659-680. PubMed ID: 34591199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Rasetshwane DM; Allen JB; Tan H; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
    Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
    Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
    Bader K; Dierkes L; Braun LH; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E; Zelle D
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical test performance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions using new stimulus conditions.
    Johnson TA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Dierking DM; Tan H; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 19701088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
    Boege P; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Arnold DJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10037289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
    Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance.
    Go NA; Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 29952805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.