347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18301908)
21. [Relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and frequency discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears].
Tanaka Y
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jan; 99(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 8822256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitudes and latencies in the groups of older people with presbyacusis and young people with normal hearing].
Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Urbaniec P; Lisowska G
Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 11070698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Dorn PA; Hoover BM; Fitzpatrick DF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):263-78. PubMed ID: 12880040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for the assessment of auditory sensitivity].
Chida E
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1998 Nov; 101(11):1335-47. PubMed ID: 9867000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Association Between Nonoptimal Blood Pressure and Cochlear Function.
Baiduc RR; Ramsey M; Sanders A; Vance EA
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):393-404. PubMed ID: 32826511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
Mills DM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Exploring Optimal Stimulus Frequency Ratio for Measurement of the Quadratic f2-f1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission in Humans.
Baiduc RR; Dhar S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1794-1806. PubMed ID: 29946695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing the level of the acoustic distortion product 2f1-f2 with behavioural threshold audiograms from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.
Gaskill SA; Brown AM
Br J Audiol; 1993 Dec; 27(6):397-407. PubMed ID: 8054897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
Hauser R; Probst R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Neely ST; Gorga MP; Dorn PA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1499-507. PubMed ID: 14514203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Weakened Cochlear Nonlinearity During Human Aging and Perceptual Correlates.
Abdala C; Ortmann AJ; Guardia YC
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):832-845. PubMed ID: 33886169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Konrad-Martin D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):271-84. PubMed ID: 11831801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
