These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18302357)

  • 1. Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods.
    Lee HS; Choi J; Kufareva I; Abagyan R; Filikov A; Yang Y; Yoon S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 18302357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of a minimal subset of receptor conformations for improved multiple conformation docking and two-step scoring.
    Yoon S; Welsh WJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 14741014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enrichment of virtual hits by progressive shape-matching and docking.
    Choi J; He N; Kim N; Yoon S
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Feb; 32():82-8. PubMed ID: 22088763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving virtual screening performance against conformational variations of receptors by shape matching with ligand binding pocket.
    Lee HS; Lee CS; Kim JS; Kim DH; Choe H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Nov; 49(11):2419-28. PubMed ID: 19852439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.
    Hawkins PC; Skillman AG; Nicholls A
    J Med Chem; 2007 Jan; 50(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 17201411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient method for high-throughput virtual screening based on flexible docking: discovery of novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
    Mizutani MY; Itai A
    J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(20):4818-28. PubMed ID: 15369385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes.
    Cavasotto CN; Kovacs JA; Abagyan RA
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jul; 127(26):9632-40. PubMed ID: 15984891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening.
    Fukunishi Y; Mikami Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Sep; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 16376595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ligand-based and receptor-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors for the CXCR4 and CCR5 receptors using 3D ligand shape matching and ligand-receptor docking.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Ritchie DW; Rabal O; Pascual R; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):509-33. PubMed ID: 18298095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of an induced fit receptor structure in virtual screening.
    Sherman W; Beard HS; Farid R
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2006 Jan; 67(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 16492153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.
    Bar-Haim S; Aharon A; Ben-Moshe T; Marantz Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 19231809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel approach to structure-based pharmacophore search using computational geometry and shape matching techniques.
    Ebalunode JO; Ouyang Z; Liang J; Zheng W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 18396858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
    Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discovery of novel HIV entry inhibitors for the CXCR4 receptor by prospective virtual screening.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Pettersson S; Ritchie DW; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):810-23. PubMed ID: 19358515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating ligand-based and protein-centric virtual screening of kinase inhibitors using ensembles of multiple protein kinase genes and conformations.
    Dixit A; Verkhivker GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2501-15. PubMed ID: 22992037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.