These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18302453)

  • 1. The relationship between posttreatment smile esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System.
    Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Jamieson SA
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18302453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S61-71. PubMed ID: 19362268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of treatment in the adult orthodontic patient as judged by orthodontists and measured by the Objective Grading System.
    Chaison ET; Liu X; Tuncay OC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):S69-75. PubMed ID: 21435541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.
    Campbell CL; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Qi R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):822-9. PubMed ID: 18068603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S72-9. PubMed ID: 19362269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Nett BC; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):444-50; quiz 516. PubMed ID: 15821689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of esthetic smiles by using computer vision techniques.
    Wong NK; Kassim AA; Foong KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 16168340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 20482353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Relationship between Posttreatment Smile Esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System: Class I Extraction versus Non-Extraction Cases.
    Kantharaju VH; Shivaprakash G; Shamnur N
    Turk J Orthod; 2021; 34(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 33828877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics Grading System.
    Scott SA; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16433082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.
    Vu CQ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Ofner S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment postretention outcomes compared using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Kuncio D; Maganzini A; Shelton C; Freeman K
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):864-9. PubMed ID: 17685783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
    Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):98-111. PubMed ID: 11500650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term occlusal changes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics' model grading system.
    Aszkler RM; Preston CB; Saltaji H; Tabbaa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24485731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two scales for evaluation of smile and dental attractiveness.
    Oliveira PL; Motta AF; Guerra CJ; Mucha JN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):42-8. PubMed ID: 25992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults.
    Maulik C; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 17826598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The functional smile: a goal for orthodontics.
    Harnick DJ
    N M Dent J; 1996 Jul; 47(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 9543833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.