These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18302456)

  • 21. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Pavlin D; Illes D; Slaj M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 20578864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparision of dental arch widths in different types of malocclusions.
    Basaran G; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 19641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of dental arch and mandibular-maxillary base widths between true and pseudo-Class III malocclusions.
    Akan B; Veli I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 28153161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
    Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dental arch dimensions and tooth wear in two samples of children in the 1950s and 1990s.
    Camporesi M; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Defraia E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Dec; 207(12):E24. PubMed ID: 19876044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dental arch dimensions in the mixed dentition: a study of Italian children born in the 1950s and the 1990s.
    Defraia E; Baroni G; Marinelli A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 16637725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.
    Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions.
    Ball RL; Miner RM; Will LA; Arai K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20620832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.
    Guyer EC; Ellis EE; McNamara JA; Behrents RG
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 3485393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion.
    Banabilh SM; Rajion ZA; Samsudin R; Singh GD
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 17203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The association of tongue posture with the dentoalveolar maxillary and mandibular morphology in Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
    Primozic J; Farcnik F; Perinetti G; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 22467568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on postero-anterior films.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 Feb; 8(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 15667642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.
    Gafni Y; Tzur-Gadassi L; Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion.
    Sayin MO; Turkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 15264647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus crowded Class I malocclusions.
    Poosti M; Jalali T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):45-52. PubMed ID: 17351681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups.
    Oktay H; Ulukaya E
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 19729399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class III malocclusions from ages 10 to 14.
    Chen F; Terada K; Yang L; Saito I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 18174073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.