These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18302470)

  • 1. Comparison of stability between cylindrical and conical type mini-implants. Mechanical and histological properties.
    Kim JW; Baek SH; Kim TW; Chang YI
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):692-8. PubMed ID: 18302470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants.
    Kim SH; Lee SJ; Cho IS; Kim SK; Kim TW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19705943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 19705930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
    Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
    Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the primary stabilities of conical and cylindrical endosseous dental implants: an in-vitro study.
    Aleo E; Varvara G; Scarano A; Sinjari B; Murmura G
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2012; 26(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 22475100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone.
    Dilek O; Tezulas E; Dincel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e20-7. PubMed ID: 18230373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants inserted into maxilla and mandible of swine.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 22677021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
    Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability.
    Lachmann S; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16441787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device.
    Menicucci G; Pachie E; Lorenzetti M; Migliaretti G; Carossa S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 22930768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
    Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.
    O'Sullivan D; Sennerby L; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 15248883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Kersken J; Nienkemper M; Weyhrother Hv; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15642025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.
    Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary stability and osseointegration: preliminary clinical results with a tapered diminishing-thread implant.
    Abbou M
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 15(2):161-8; quiz 170. PubMed ID: 12772634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
    Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.