These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18302479)

  • 1. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review.
    Leonardi R; Annunziata A; Caltabiano M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 18302479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
    Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.
    Lou L; Lagravere MO; Compton S; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17709072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review.
    Leonardi R; Annunziata A; Licciardello V; Barbato E
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 19852663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Landmark identification in computerized posteroanterior cephalometrics.
    El-Mangoury NH; Shaheen SI; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Jan; 91(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 3467581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison Efficiency of Posteroanterior Cephalometry and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Detecting Craniofacial Asymmetry: A Systematic Review.
    Yousefi F; Rafiei E; Mahdian M; Mollabashi V; Saboonchi SS; Hosseini SM
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(2):358-371. PubMed ID: 32308303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
    Polizzi A; Leonardi R
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients. A systematic review.
    Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):876-81. PubMed ID: 17029526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. True molar intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.
    Ng J; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 17169732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review of cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the Activator and Bionator appliances in Class II division 1 subjects.
    Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 17095741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry: a systematic review.
    Smektała T; Jędrzejewski M; Szyndel J; Sporniak-Tutak K; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 25037877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue changes with fixed functional appliances in Class II division 1.
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):712-20. PubMed ID: 16808582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs.
    Yoon YJ; Kim DH; Yu PS; Kim HJ; Choi EH; Kim KW
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11843271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review.
    Durão AR; Pittayapat P; Rockenbach MI; Olszewski R; Ng S; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14(1):31. PubMed ID: 24325757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review.
    Lagravere MO; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1046-52. PubMed ID: 16448254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. True incisor intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ng J; Major PW; Heo G; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 16102407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.