148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18303285)
1. Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Booya F; Paulsen S; Fidler J; Johnson CD; Huprich J; Barlow J; Trout A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 18303285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distention.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Schneemann H; Kuehle C; Nuefer M; Ruehm SG; Goehde SC; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1400-6. PubMed ID: 15754160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small bowel MRI: comparison of a polyethylene glycol preparation and water as oral contrast media.
Sood RR; Joubert I; Franklin H; Doyle T; Lomas DJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Apr; 15(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 11948829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention.
Kuehle CA; Ajaj W; Ladd SC; Massing S; Barkhausen J; Lauenstein TC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):W375-85. PubMed ID: 16985108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy--feasibility study.
Wold PB; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD; Sandborn WJ
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):275-81. PubMed ID: 12944602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR enterography in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: retrospective assessment of patient tolerance, image quality, and initial performance estimates.
Absah I; Bruining DH; Matsumoto JM; Weisbrod AJ; Fletcher JG; Fidler JL; Faubion WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W367-75. PubMed ID: 22915428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR of the small bowel with a biphasic oral contrast agent (polyethylene glycol): technical aspects and findings in patients affected by Crohn's disease.
Laghi A; Paolantonio P; Iafrate F; Borrelli O; Dito L; Tomei E; Cucchiara S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):18-27. PubMed ID: 12951547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel.
Lauenstein TC; Schneemann H; Vogt FM; Herborn CU; Ruhm SG; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 12750457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography of the bowel: a prospective comparison study between four techniques.
Paparo F; Garlaschi A; Biscaldi E; Bacigalupo L; Cevasco L; Rollandi GA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 22999647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of the small bowel.
Masselli G; Gualdi G
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):333-48. PubMed ID: 22821694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of methylcellulose in small bowel follow-through examination: comparison with conventional series in normal subjects.
Ha HK; Park KB; Kim PN; Lee M; Hong WS; Yang S; Lee SK; Kim MH; Suh DJ; Min YI; Auh YH
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 9569297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation.
Antoch G; Kuehl H; Kanja J; Lauenstein TC; Schneemann H; Hauth E; Jentzen W; Beyer T; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):879-85. PubMed ID: 14764889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyethylene glycol solution as an oral contrast agent for MR imaging of the small bowel.
Laghi A; Carbone I; Catalano C; Iannaccone R; Paolantonio P; Baeli I; Trenna S; Passariello R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1333-4. PubMed ID: 11717077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MR enterography with polyethylene glycol as oral contrast medium in the follow-up of patients with Crohn disease: comparison with CT enterography.
Ippolito D; Invernizzi F; Galimberti S; Panelli MR; Sironi S
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 19582502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonography of the small bowel after oral administration of anechoic contrast solution.
Pallotta N; Baccini F; Corazziari E
Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9157):985-6. PubMed ID: 10459917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Small intestine contrast ultrasonography.
Pallotta N; Baccini F; Corazziari E
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Jan; 19(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 10625186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT enterography with polyethylene glycol solution vs CT enteroclysis in small bowel disease.
Minordi LM; Vecchioli A; Mirk P; Bonomo L
Br J Radiol; 2011 Feb; 84(998):112-9. PubMed ID: 20959377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
