These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18303545)

  • 1. Optimizing the fragmentation and clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kekre NS; Kumar S
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 18303545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for passage of renal and ureteral calculi.
    Losek RL; Mauro LS
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 May; 42(5):692-7. PubMed ID: 18413683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of modification of shock-wave delivery on stone fragmentation.
    Talic RF; Rabah DM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16479209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Madaan S; Joyce AD
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17285020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?
    Bhagat SK; Chacko NK; Kekre NS; Gopalakrishnan G; Antonisamy B; Devasia A
    J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2185-8. PubMed ID: 17509314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance?
    Albanis S; Ather HM; Papatsoris AG; Masood J; Staios D; Sheikh T; Akhtar S; Buchholz N
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 19752619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.
    Argyropoulos AN; Tolley DA
    Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 17499914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
    Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves.
    Kurien A; Symons S; Manohar T; Desai M
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18727616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical therapy for calculus disease.
    Singh SK; Agarwal MM; Sharma S
    BJU Int; 2011 Feb; 107(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 21244607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
    Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Blomgren PM; Lingeman JE
    BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. PubMed ID: 17550415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li K; Lin T; Zhang C; Fan X; Xu K; Bi L; Han J; Huang H; Liu H; Dong W; Duan Y; Yu M; Huang J
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1260-7. PubMed ID: 23538240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of shockwave failure in patients with urinary tract stones.
    Kim FJ; Rice KR
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 16479210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of extended use of an electromagnetic lithotripter beyond the manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule.
    Chen TY; Ponsot Y; Brouillette M; Tétrault JP; Tu le M
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3560-5. PubMed ID: 17594746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of salivary gland stones: an in vitro feasibility study.
    Iro H; Nitsche N; Meier J; Wirtz PM; Ell C
    J Lithotr Stone Dis; 1991 Jul; 3(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 10149165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zomorrodi A; Golivandan J; Samady J
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2008 May; 19(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 18445899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shock wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi.
    Tayib AM; Mosli HA; Farsi HM; Atwa MA; Saada HA
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Aug; 29(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 18690315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there an adjunctive role of tamsulosin to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteric stones: results of an open label randomized nonplacebo controlled study.
    Agarwal MM; Naja V; Singh SK; Mavuduru R; Mete UK; Kumar S; Mandal AK
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):989-92. PubMed ID: 19883809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.
    Elmansy HE; Lingeman JE
    Int J Surg; 2016 Dec; 36(Pt D):676-680. PubMed ID: 27890653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.