224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18304032)
1. Embolic Doppler ultrasound signal detection using continuous wavelet transform to detect multiple vascular emboli.
Ng HS; Hao Q; Leung T; Lawrence Wong KS; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM; Johansen P
J Neuroimaging; 2008 Oct; 18(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 18304032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online automated detection of cerebral embolic signals using a wavelet-based system.
Marvasti S; Gillies D; Marvasti F; Markus HS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 May; 30(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 15183231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postinterventional microembolism signals detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasound after carotid artery stenting.
Piorkowski M; Kläffling C; Botsios S; Zerweck C; Scheinert S; Banning-Eichenseher U; Bausback Y; Scheinert D; Schmidt A
Vasa; 2015 Jan; 44(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 25537058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound in the Current Era of Carotid Artery Stenting.
Spacek M; Sorrell VL; Veselka J
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Aug; 36(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 24963921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of simultaneous pre- and postfilter transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid artery stenting.
Garami ZF; Bismuth J; Charlton-Ouw KM; Davies MG; Peden EK; Lumsden AB
J Vasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 49(2):340-4, 345.e1-2; discussion 345. PubMed ID: 19216954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of emboli during carotid stenting with distal protection device.
Chen CI; Iguchi Y; Garami Z; Malkoff MD; Smalling RW; Campbell MS; Alexandrov AV
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 21(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 16446534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The matching pursuit: a new method of characterizing microembolic signals?
Devuyst G; Vesin JM; Despland PA; Bogousslavsky J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 26(6):1051-6. PubMed ID: 10996705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid stenting and transcranial Doppler monitoring: indications for carotid stenosis treatment.
Gattuso R; Martinelli O; Alunno A; D'Angeli I; Felli M; Castiglione A; Izzo L; Gossetti B
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2010 Oct; 44(7):535-8. PubMed ID: 20675330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD.
Devuyst G; Darbellay GA; Vesin JM; Kemény V; Ritter M; Droste DW; Molina C; Serena J; Sztajzel R; Ruchat P; Lucchesi C; Dietler G; Ringelstein EB; Despland PA; Bogousslavsky J
Stroke; 2001 Dec; 32(12):2803-9. PubMed ID: 11739977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of the wavelet transform to describe embolic signals.
Aydin N; Padayachee S; Markus HS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 25(6):953-8. PubMed ID: 10461724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term ambulatory monitoring for cerebral emboli using transcranial Doppler ultrasound.
Mackinnon AD; Aaslid R; Markus HS
Stroke; 2004 Jan; 35(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 14684774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of microembolic signals detected near their origins in middle cerebral artery stenoses.
Gao S; Wong KS
J Neuroimaging; 2003 Apr; 13(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 12722494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system.
Markus HS; Punter M
Stroke; 2005 Aug; 36(8):1731-4. PubMed ID: 16020767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous cerebral microemboli with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler.
Russell D; Brucher R
Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):1975-80. PubMed ID: 12154248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation between gaseous and formed embolic materials in vivo. Application in prosthetic heart valve patients.
Georgiadis D; Mackay TG; Kelman AW; Grosset DG; Wheatley DJ; Lees KR
Stroke; 1994 Aug; 25(8):1559-63. PubMed ID: 7913774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A combined power m-mode and single gate transcranial doppler ultrasound microemboli signal criteria for improving emboli detection and reliability.
Choi Y; Saqqur M; Asil T; Jin A; Stewart E; Stephenson C; Ibrahim M; Roy J; Boulanger JM; Coutts S; Khan F; Demchuk AM
J Neuroimaging; 2010 Oct; 20(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 19912481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method to distinguish between gaseous and solid cerebral emboli in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Rodriguez RA; Nathan HJ; Ruel M; Rubens F; Dafoe D; Mesana T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 18952455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-emboli detection: an ultrasound Doppler signal processing viewpoint.
Girault JM; Kouamé D; Ouahabi A; Patat F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1431-9. PubMed ID: 11077736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cerebral microemboli and brain injury during carotid artery endarterectomy and stenting.
Skjelland M; Krohg-Sørensen K; Tennøe B; Bakke SJ; Brucher R; Russell D
Stroke; 2009 Jan; 40(1):230-4. PubMed ID: 18927460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Solid or gaseous circulating brain emboli: are they separable by transcranial ultrasound?
Darbellay GA; Duff R; Vesin JM; Despland PA; Droste DW; Molina C; Serena J; Sztajzel R; Ruchat P; Karapanayiotides T; Kalangos A; Bogousslavsky J; Ringelstein EB; Devuyst G
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2004 Aug; 24(8):860-8. PubMed ID: 15362716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
