132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18304288)
1. The Skill Plot: a graphical technique for evaluating continuous diagnostic tests.
Briggs WM; Zaretzki R
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):250-6; discussion 256-61. PubMed ID: 18304288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision strategies that maximize the area under the LROC curve.
Khurd P; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1626-36. PubMed ID: 16353373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extending the skill test for disease diagnosis.
Lin SC; Kvam PH; Lu JC
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):798-813. PubMed ID: 19072748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision optimization of case-based computer-aided decision systems using genetic algorithms with application to mammography.
Mazurowski MA; Habas PA; Zurada JM; Tourassi GD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):895-908. PubMed ID: 18263947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. System for selecting relevant information for decision support.
Kalina J; Seidl L; Zvára K; Grünfeldová H; Slovák D; Zvárová J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 186():83-7. PubMed ID: 23542973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
Van Meerhaeghe A
Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.
Siadaty MS; Shu J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Dec; 4(1):27. PubMed ID: 15588327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Computer-based system for monitoring the course of intraocular inflammation].
Bauer AM; Plaza D; Wetter T; Becker MD
Ophthalmologe; 2005 Nov; 102(11):1069-73. PubMed ID: 15915333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted diagnostic decision support: history, challenges, and possible paths forward.
Miller RA
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():89-106. PubMed ID: 19672686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nomographic representation of logistic regression models: a case study using patient self-assessment data.
Dreiseitl S; Harbauer A; Binder M; Kittler H
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 16198997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic factors in gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcer: construction of a predictive model.
Zaragoza AM; Tenías JM; Llorente MJ; Alborch A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):786-90. PubMed ID: 18580501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ordered multiple-class ROC analysis with continuous measurements.
Nakas CT; Yiannoutsos CT
Stat Med; 2004 Nov; 23(22):3437-49. PubMed ID: 15505886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A statistical method for the quantification of the learning index by means of multiple answer tests-Graduated Response Test.
Candini G
Comput Biol Med; 2004 Dec; 34(8):663-78. PubMed ID: 15518651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical decision support systems: potential with pitfalls.
Eberhardt J; Bilchik A; Stojadinovic A
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 105(5):502-10. PubMed ID: 22441903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An interactive dynamic analysis and decision support software for MR mammography.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Tunaci M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 18343634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
