These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18304903)

  • 1. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
    Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A strategic framework for novel drug development in multiple myeloma.
    Anderson KC; Hannah AL; Pazdur R; Farrell AT
    Br J Haematol; 2007 Jul; 138(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 17593022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New paradigm in dose-finding trials: patient-specific dosing and beyond phase I.
    Rogatko A; Babb JS; Tighiouart M; Khuri FR; Hudes G
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Aug; 11(15):5342-6. PubMed ID: 16061846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing drugs that do not cause tumor regression.
    Stadler W
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 1(11):654-5. PubMed ID: 16258462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
    Farley J; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical trials.
    Farrington P; Miller E
    Methods Mol Med; 2003; 87():335-52. PubMed ID: 12958466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized phase II trials: misleading and unreliable.
    Stewart DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):e649-50; author reply e651-3. PubMed ID: 20855829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Phase I cancer trials methodology].
    Le Tourneau C; Faivre S; Raymond E; Diéras V
    Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):943-51. PubMed ID: 18055311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1571-8. PubMed ID: 15122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trials of novel and targeted therapies: endpoints, trial design, and analysis.
    Suman VJ; Dueck A; Sargent DJ
    Cancer Invest; 2008 Jun; 26(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 18568764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Other paradigms: better treatments are identified by better trials: the value of randomized phase II studies.
    Sharma MR; Maitland ML; Ratain MJ
    Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 19826363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?
    Ang MK; Tan SB; Lim WT
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Mar; 10(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 20214523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
    El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
    Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal designs for estimating the most successful dose.
    Zohar S; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4311-20. PubMed ID: 16969893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and conduct of phase II studies of targeted anticancer therapy: recommendations from the task force on methodology for the development of innovative cancer therapies (MDICT).
    Booth CM; Calvert AH; Giaccone G; Lobbezoo MW; Eisenhauer EA; Seymour LK
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 44(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17845846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Di Maio M; Daniele B; Gallo C; Perrone F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Nov; 100(21):1557; author reply 1557-8. PubMed ID: 18957679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.
    Huang B; Chappell R
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2070-93. PubMed ID: 17764082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.