812 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18304903)
21. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
Pond GR; Abbasi S
Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. New designs for phase II trials: application to a trial of targeted therapies vs. chemotherapy in patients age > 60 with AML/high-risk MDS.
Estey EH
Ann Hematol; 2004; 83 Suppl 1():S94-6. PubMed ID: 15124692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [A combination phase I/II study--dose escalation plan].
Yamamoto N
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Dec; 27(14):2267-74. PubMed ID: 11142175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Surrogate endpoints].
Hill C
Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):622-4. PubMed ID: 10477379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phase II clinical trial design: methods in translational research from the Genitourinary Committee at the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Gray R; Manola J; Saxman S; Wright J; Dutcher J; Atkins M; Carducci M; See W; Sweeney C; Liu G; Stein M; Dreicer R; Wilding G; DiPaola RS
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):1966-9. PubMed ID: 16609005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Choice of designs and doses for early phase trials.
Zhou Y
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 15147290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The development of phase I cancer trial methodologies: the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points sets the scene for phase 0 cancer clinical trials.
Calvert AH; Plummer R
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jun; 14(12):3664-9. PubMed ID: 18559580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the most effective.
Haines IE
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 26(21):3650-2; author reply 3652-3. PubMed ID: 18640947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the top.
Sleijfer S; Wiemer E
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 26(10):1576-8. PubMed ID: 18332465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.
Tuma RS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Feb; 100(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18230788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.
Adjei AA; Christian M; Ivy P
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1866-72. PubMed ID: 19276272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical trials referral resource. Current phase II and phase III clinical trials in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Mooney MM; Schoenfeldt M
Oncology (Williston Park); 2004 Oct; 18(11):1396, 1401, 1404 passim. PubMed ID: 15609469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical trial designs for targeted agents.
Ma BB; Britten CD; Siu LL
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2002 Oct; 16(5):1287-305. PubMed ID: 12512393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [New trends in assessment in anticancer treatments by phase II clinical trials].
Medioni JR; Rycke YD; Asselain B
Bull Cancer; 2000 Jul; 87(7-8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10969213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.
LoRusso PM; Boerner SA; Seymour L
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Mar; 16(6):1710-8. PubMed ID: 20215546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
Normolle D; Lawrence T
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
