These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18304903)

  • 21. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Pond GR; Abbasi S
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New designs for phase II trials: application to a trial of targeted therapies vs. chemotherapy in patients age > 60 with AML/high-risk MDS.
    Estey EH
    Ann Hematol; 2004; 83 Suppl 1():S94-6. PubMed ID: 15124692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A combination phase I/II study--dose escalation plan].
    Yamamoto N
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Dec; 27(14):2267-74. PubMed ID: 11142175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Surrogate endpoints].
    Hill C
    Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):622-4. PubMed ID: 10477379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phase II clinical trial design: methods in translational research from the Genitourinary Committee at the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Gray R; Manola J; Saxman S; Wright J; Dutcher J; Atkins M; Carducci M; See W; Sweeney C; Liu G; Stein M; Dreicer R; Wilding G; DiPaola RS
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):1966-9. PubMed ID: 16609005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Choice of designs and doses for early phase trials.
    Zhou Y
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 15147290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
    Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
    Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development of phase I cancer trial methodologies: the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points sets the scene for phase 0 cancer clinical trials.
    Calvert AH; Plummer R
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jun; 14(12):3664-9. PubMed ID: 18559580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the most effective.
    Haines IE
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 26(21):3650-2; author reply 3652-3. PubMed ID: 18640947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose selection in phase I studies: why we should always go for the top.
    Sleijfer S; Wiemer E
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 26(10):1576-8. PubMed ID: 18332465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.
    Tuma RS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Feb; 100(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18230788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.
    Adjei AA; Christian M; Ivy P
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1866-72. PubMed ID: 19276272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical trials referral resource. Current phase II and phase III clinical trials in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
    Mooney MM; Schoenfeldt M
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2004 Oct; 18(11):1396, 1401, 1404 passim. PubMed ID: 15609469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
    Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical trial designs for targeted agents.
    Ma BB; Britten CD; Siu LL
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2002 Oct; 16(5):1287-305. PubMed ID: 12512393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [New trends in assessment in anticancer treatments by phase II clinical trials].
    Medioni JR; Rycke YD; Asselain B
    Bull Cancer; 2000 Jul; 87(7-8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10969213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.
    LoRusso PM; Boerner SA; Seymour L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Mar; 16(6):1710-8. PubMed ID: 20215546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
    Normolle D; Lawrence T
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.