These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18305919)

  • 1. [Workflow in digital screening mammography].
    Bick U; Diekmann F; Fallenberg EM
    Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 18305919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wacker T; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):324-34. PubMed ID: 18335192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital mammography: an update.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Breast Imaging Workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):305M-322M; quiz 323M-326M. PubMed ID: 26721854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group.
    Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organisational aspects of mammography screening in digital settings: first experiences of Luxembourg.
    Shannoun F; Schanck JM; Scharpantgen A; Wagnon MC; Ben Daoud M; Back C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 18448438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography: coming of age.
    Morin RL; Maidment AD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):798-801. PubMed ID: 17411931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Covington MF; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Pockaj BA; Northfelt DW; Appleton CM; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):292-300. PubMed ID: 29064748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.
    Parkin GJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):61-6. PubMed ID: 7734542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(3):245M-60M. PubMed ID: 21209426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
    Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Challenges of Implementing an Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technology Into Clinical Practice.
    Lee CI; Lehman CD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R61-R66. PubMed ID: 27814817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects.
    Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):74-9. PubMed ID: 7734545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of brilliant x-rays in mammography. Development and perspectives of phase contrast techniques].
    Schneider T; Coan P; Habs D; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 18311554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Hooley RJ; Durand MA; Philpotts LE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):256-266. PubMed ID: 27786548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer.
    Karellas A; Lo JY; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):409-11. PubMed ID: 18383660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.