179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18306357)
1. Is there still a role for fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening? Experience of the Verona Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening Program with real-time integrated radiopathologic activity (1999-2004).
Manfrin E; Mariotto R; Remo A; Reghellin D; Dalfior D; Falsirollo F; Bonetti F
Cancer; 2008 Apr; 114(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 18306357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging of breast cancer with ultrasound.
Yang WT
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 21782123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of sonography in patients with breast cancer presenting as an axillary mass.
Park SY; Kim EK; Oh KK; Lee KS; Park BW
Korean J Radiol; 2002; 3(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 12271164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of core needle biopsy in the treatment of radial scar.
Tóth D; Sebő É; Sarkadi L; Kovács I; Kiss C; Damjanovich L
Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):761-3. PubMed ID: 22397896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Echogenicity of breast cancer: is it of prognostic value?
Soon PS; Vallentine J; Palmer A; Magarey CJ; Schwartz P; Morris DL
Breast; 2004 Jun; 13(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 15177421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of mammographic screening on the surgical management of breast cancer.
James TA; Wade JE; Sprague BL
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 113(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 26799535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [40 years of progress in breast imaging].
De Maulmont C; Cherel P; Ouhioun O; Becette V; Stevens D; Plantet MM; Hagay C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 11141915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment.
Apffelstaedt SP; Dalmayer L; Baatjes K
S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 25118556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population.
Morris EA; Liberman L; Ballon DJ; Robson M; Abramson AF; Heerdt A; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):619-26. PubMed ID: 12933450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathologic nipple discharge in patients with radiologically invisible mass: review of 28 consecutive sub-areolar explorations.
Kocdor MA; Sevinc AI; Canda T; Balci P; Saydam S; Cavdaroglu O; Harmancioglu O
Breast J; 2009; 15(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 19645776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Audit system on quality of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: results of quality indicators on screen-detected lesions in Italy, 2010].
Ponti A; Mano MP; Tomatis M; Baiocchi D; Barca A; Berti R; Bisanti L; Casella D; Deandrea S; Delrio D; Donati G; Falcini F; Frammartino B; Frigerio A; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Orzalesi L; Pagano G; Pietribiasi F; Ravaioli A; Sedda ML; Taffurelli M; Cataliotti L; Segnan N
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(6 Suppl 1):87-95. PubMed ID: 23293273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Bofin AM; Lydersen S; Hagmar BM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Oct; 31(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15452908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the work-up of mammographic and ultrasonographic findings in breast cancer screening: an attempt at differentiating in situ and invasive carcinoma.
Sauer T; Young K; Thoresen SØ
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 11952748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of patients with radiographically occult, palpable breast abnormalities.
Ajkay N; Bloomquist EV; Martin RC; Frazier TG; Barrio AV
Surgery; 2015 Oct; 158(4):946-52; discussion 952-3. PubMed ID: 26283205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Case quiz. Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast.
Muttarak M; Chaiwun B; Trakultivakorn H
Australas Radiol; 2002 Mar; 46(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 11966605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
