807 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18307902)
1. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].
Li Y; Chen ZJ; Yang HJ; Zhong WX; Ma SY; Li M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):753-5. PubMed ID: 18307902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
Balaban B; Urman B; Ata B; Isiklar A; Larman MG; Hamilton R; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1976-82. PubMed ID: 18544577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?
Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Tarlatzis BC
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 21(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 19276976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.
Levron J; Leibovitz O; Brengauz M; Gitman H; Yerushalmi GM; Katorza E; Gat I; Elizur SE
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar; 30(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 24397397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
Kahraman S; Candan ZN
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison on in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in KSOM or SOF and cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification.
Nedambale TL; Dinnyés A; Groen W; Dobrinsky JR; Tian XC; Yang X
Theriogenology; 2004 Aug; 62(3-4):437-49. PubMed ID: 15226000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of genotype on the efficiency of mouse embryo cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing methods.
Dinnyés A; Wallace GA; Rall WF
Mol Reprod Dev; 1995 Apr; 40(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 7598908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional slow freezing, vitrification and open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification of rabbit embryos.
Naik BR; Rao BS; Vagdevi R; Gnanprakash M; Amarnath D; Rao VH
Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Apr; 86(3-4):329-38. PubMed ID: 15766810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blastocyst rate and live births from vitrification and slow-cooled two-cell mouse embryos.
Graves-Herring JE; Boone WR
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):920-4. PubMed ID: 18314119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cryotop vitrification as compared to conventional slow freezing for human embryos at the cleavage stage: survival and outcomes.
Lin TK; Su JT; Lee FK; Lin YR; Lo HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 49(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 21056310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy.
Van Landuyt L; Stoop D; Verheyen G; Verpoest W; Camus M; Van de Velde H; Devroey P; Van den Abbeel E
Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):527-34. PubMed ID: 21212054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (>or=10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma.
Luna M; Copperman AB; Duke M; Ezcurra D; Sandler B; Barritt J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 17531231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Successful pregnancies after oocyte cryopreservation with slow-freezing method: a report of 3 cases.
Ding J; Rana N; Dmowski WP
J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct; 53(10):813-20. PubMed ID: 19004412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates.
Stanger J; Wong J; Conceicao J; Yovich J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Mar; 24(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 22289155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra rapid freezing and vitrification of human embryos derived from abnormally fertilised zygotes.
Molina I; Duque CC; Alfonso J; Cervera RP; Romeu A
Cryo Letters; 2006; 27(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16691310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of different cryopreservation techniques: higher survival and implantation rate of frozen-thawed mouse pronuclear embryos in the presence of beta-mercaptoethanol in post-thaw culture.
Bagis H; Akkoc T; Taskin C; Arat S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2010 Dec; 45(6):e332-7. PubMed ID: 20074321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
