BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18307923)

  • 1. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of the temporomandibular joint structure following mandibular advancement].
    Shi JJ; Zeng XL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):665-8. PubMed ID: 18307923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporomandibular joint effects of activator treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical study.
    Ruf S; Wüsten B; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12518944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in the TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Arat ZM; Gökalp H; Erdem D; Erden I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 11244427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disc-condyle Relationships during Class II Treatment with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA).
    Kinzinger G; Gülden N; Roth A; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Sep; 67(5):356-75. PubMed ID: 16953355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and magnetic resonance findings in the temporomandibular joints of patients before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Gaggl A; Schultes G; Santler G; Kärcher H; Simbrunner J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 37(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10203221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Herbst appliance therapy and temporomandibular joint disc position: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aidar LA; Abrahão M; Yamashita HK; Dominguez GC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 16627174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topography and morphology of the mandibular condyle during fixed functional orthopedic treatment --a magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Kinzinger G; Kober C; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Mar; 68(2):124-47. PubMed ID: 17372710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aras A; Ada E; Saracoğlu H; Gezer NS; Aras I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporomandibular joint changes after activator appliance therapy: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Ma X; Fang B; Dai Q; Xia Y; Mao L; Jiang L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1184-9. PubMed ID: 23851766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
    Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study.
    Wadhawan N; Kumar S; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Sharma R
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 18950321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element method study. Part 1.
    Gupta A; Kohli VS; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Gunjal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):737-48. PubMed ID: 19524833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Part 2.
    Gupta A; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Kohli VS; Gunjal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 19524834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.
    Rodrigues AF; Fraga MR; Vitral RW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 19651349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-stage comprehensive surgical treatment of the rheumatoid arthritis temporomandibular joint patient.
    Mehra P; Wolford LM; Baran S; Cassano DS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1859-72. PubMed ID: 19686922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscular and condylar response to rapid maxillary expansion. Part 2: magnetic resonance imaging study of the temporomandibular joint.
    Arat FE; Arat ZM; Tompson B; Tanju S; Erden I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 18538245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of mandibular protrusive (activator) appliances on articular eminence morphology.
    Katsavrias EG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 14719728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation and articular disc positional changes in functional orthopedic treatment: magnetic resonance imaging investigation.
    Wangsrimongkol T; Manosudprasit M; Pisek P; Chowchuen P; Chantaramungkorn M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Nov; 95 Suppl 11():S106-15. PubMed ID: 23961629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I).
    Kinzinger GS; Roth A; Gülden N; Bücker A; Diedrich PR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 16940482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Condyle movement in class II division 1 malocclusion patients after functional appliance treatment].
    Zhang XJ; Bai YX; Yang XJ; Wang BK
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 42(8):475-6. PubMed ID: 18001590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.