These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18308692)

  • 1. Radiation exposure and vascular access site.
    Hamon M; Sourgounis A
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(7):954; author reply 954-5. PubMed ID: 18308692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 22516403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radial artery catheterization and radiological exposure.
    Pristipino C
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Sep; 29(18):2316-7. PubMed ID: 18617484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study.
    Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes.
    Brasselet C; Blanpain T; Tassan-Mangina S; Deschildre A; Duval S; Vitry F; Gaillot-Petit N; Clément JP; Metz D
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Jan; 29(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 17999984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study.
    Lo TS; Ratib K; Chong AY; Bhatia G; Gunning M; Nolan J
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 23067901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach.
    Marque N; Jégou A; Varenne O; Salengro E; Allouch P; Margot O; Spaulding C
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Nov; 102(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 19944390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alarm for radialists from its evangelist.
    Saito S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):17. PubMed ID: 16331695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
    Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occupational radiation exposure in femoral artery approach is higher than radial artery approach during coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kim JS; Lee BK; Ryu DR; Chun K; Kwon HS; Nam SR; Kim DI; Lee SY; Jeong JO; Bae JW; Park JS; Ahn Y; Chae JK; Yoon MH; Lee SH; Yoon J; Gwon HC; Choi D; Kwon SM; Roh YH; Cho BR
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7104. PubMed ID: 32346022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Old is the new new.
    Balter S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):85. PubMed ID: 20578218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation safety: Patients First "Where Is the Radiation Needle on the Ethical Compass?".
    Chambers CE; Miller DL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1171-2. PubMed ID: 25999276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on "A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient".
    Jones AK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):958-9. PubMed ID: 25914315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to comment on "a randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient".
    Roguin A; Musallam A; Rappaport B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):960. PubMed ID: 25914301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16331696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decreasing operators' radiation exposure during coronary procedures: the transradial radiation protection board.
    Behan M; Haworth P; Colley P; Brittain M; Hince A; Clarke M; Ghuran A; Saha M; Hildick-Smith D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20578091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operator vs. patient radiation exposure in transradial and transfemoral coronary interventions.
    Bertrand OF; Arsenault J; Mongrain R
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Oct; 29(20):2577-8. PubMed ID: 18775920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comment on 'Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes'.
    Agostoni P; Testa L; Biondi-Zoccai GG
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Nov; 29(22):2820-1. PubMed ID: 18826985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arms and armor.
    Balter S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):103. PubMed ID: 22190210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation exposure with transradial and transfemoral procedures.
    Pancholy SB; Bertrand OF
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 23453088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.