These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18308925)

  • 1. Effects of accessibility and subjective relevance on the use of piecemeal and category information in impression formation.
    Köpetz C; Kruglanski AW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):692-705. PubMed ID: 18308925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moods as spotlights: the influence of mood on accessibility effects.
    Avramova YR; Stapel DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):542-54. PubMed ID: 18729693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
    Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of the activation of affective information on stereotyping: when sadness increases stereotype use.
    Ric F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1310-21. PubMed ID: 15466603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment.
    Petty RE; DeMarree KG; Briñol P; Horcajo J; Strathman AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 34(7):900-12. PubMed ID: 18463396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost of forming more accurate impressions: accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal.
    Biesanz JC; Human LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 20424106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effects of mere subliminal exposure on trait judgments and the role of stereotyped knowledge].
    Yamada A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Jun; 75(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 15747544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic optimism: the affective basis of judgments about the likelihood of future events.
    Lench HC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 19397379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: the role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments.
    Meiser T; Hewstone M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):599-614. PubMed ID: 15535774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-serving interpretations of flattery: why ingratiation works.
    Vonk R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Apr; 82(4):515-26. PubMed ID: 11999921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
    Hugenberg K; Bodenhausen GV; McLain M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17144762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The composition of category conjunctions.
    Hutter RR; Crisp RJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 May; 31(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 15802659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
    Pettibone JC; Wedell DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options.
    Davis T; Love BC
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20424052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How the adoption of impression management goals alters impression formation.
    Gibson B; Poposki EM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20921279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When less is more: the consequences of affective primacy for subliminal priming effects.
    Stapel DA; Koomen W
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1286-95. PubMed ID: 16055647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel view of between-categories contrast and within-category assimilation.
    Quellar S; Schell T; Mason W
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(3):406-22. PubMed ID: 16938027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility.
    Sechrist GB; Stangor C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Apr; 80(4):645-54. PubMed ID: 11316227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.