BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18309207)

  • 1. Optimal sludge retention time for a bench scale MBR treating municipal sewage.
    Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Giordano C; Sandulli R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 18309207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of solid retention time on the rheology of MBR sludge.
    Giordano C; Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):151-9. PubMed ID: 17978443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times.
    Laera G; Giordano C; Pollice A; Saturno D; Mininni G
    Water Res; 2007 Oct; 41(18):4197-203. PubMed ID: 17619046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of complete sludge retention on biomass build-up in a membrane bioreactor.
    Pollice A; Laera G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):369-75. PubMed ID: 16459811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical characteristics of the sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor.
    Pollice A; Giordano C; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
    Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1832-40. PubMed ID: 17324447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
    Pollice A; Laera G; Blonda M
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1799-808. PubMed ID: 15026234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
    Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time.
    Massé A; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2405-15. PubMed ID: 16759682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of solids retention time on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor.
    Cicek N; Macomber J; Davel J; Suidan MT; Audic J; Genestet P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(11):43-50. PubMed ID: 11443985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long term performance of MBR for biological nitrogen removal from synthetic municipal wastewater.
    Holakoo L; Nakhla G; Bassi AS; Yanful EK
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(5):849-57. PubMed ID: 16870234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occurrence of EPS in activated sludge from a membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
    Evenblij H; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):293-300. PubMed ID: 15686034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
    Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
    Al-Halbouni D; Traber J; Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T; Tacke D; Janot A; Dott W; Hollender J
    Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling.
    Kimura K; Naruse T; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19059627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
    Laera G; Pollice A; Saturno D; Giordano C; Lopez A
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5241-9. PubMed ID: 16290181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of chemical sludge disintegration on the performances of wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor.
    Oh YK; Lee KR; Ko KB; Yeom IT
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2665-71. PubMed ID: 17451782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimization of sludge production and stable operational condition of a submerged membrane activated sludge process.
    Bhatta CP; Matsuda A; Kawasaki K; Omori D
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(9):121-8. PubMed ID: 15581003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.