BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18310642)

  • 1. Quality improvement or research? A report from the trenches.
    Wise L
    Am J Crit Care; 2008 Mar; 17(2):98-9. PubMed ID: 18310642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality improvement or research? The ethics of hospital project oversight.
    Morris PE; Dracup K
    Am J Crit Care; 2007 Sep; 16(5):424-6. PubMed ID: 17724233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research and quality improvement: drawing lines in the grey zone.
    Brown LH; Shah MN; Menegazzi JJ
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(3):350-1. PubMed ID: 17613915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research ethics and law of healthcare system quality improvement: the conflict of cost containment and quality.
    Kofke WA; Rie MA
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S143-52. PubMed ID: 12626960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethics and quality improvement. Quality care and ethical principles cannot be separated when considering quality improvement activities.
    Nelson WA; Gardent PB
    Healthc Exec; 2008; 23(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 18724589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical issues surrounding quality improvement activities: a review.
    Wise LC
    J Nurs Adm; 2007 Jun; 37(6):272-8. PubMed ID: 17563519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality improvement, clinical research, and quality improvement research--opportunities for integration.
    Margolis P; Provost LP; Schoettker PJ; Britto MT
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 56(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 19660630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research and quality improvement: different processes, different evidence.
    Kring DL
    Medsurg Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(3):162-9; quiz 170. PubMed ID: 18686420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of independent review to insure ethical quality-improvement activities in oncology: a commentary on the national debate regarding the distinction between quality-improvement initiatives and clinical research.
    Markman M
    Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(12):2597-600. PubMed ID: 17960605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recommendations for the ethical conduct of quality improvement.
    Fox E; Tulsky JA
    J Clin Ethics; 2005; 16(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15915847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Code of conduct--good practice for research in health care financed by third parties].
    ;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2006 Dec; 68(12):796. PubMed ID: 17203455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ethics of quality improvement research.
    Siegel MD; Alfano SL
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):791-2. PubMed ID: 19325394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring quality.
    Ash A
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 18219236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leading-edge quality assurance activity.
    Hurst K
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2009; 22(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 19725205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should quality improvement projects require IRB approval?
    Weiserbs KF; Lyutic L; Weinberg J
    Acad Med; 2009 Feb; 84(2):153. PubMed ID: 19174653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross cultural care. Bridging the cultural gap to better healthcare.
    Williams B
    Tenn Med; 2007 Oct; 100(10):25-9. PubMed ID: 17966709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crossroads in quality.
    O'Kane M; Corrigan J; Foote SM; Tunis SR; Isham GJ; Nichols LM; Fisher ES; Ebeler JC; Block JA; Bradley BE; Cassel CK; Ness DL; Tooker J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(3):749-58. PubMed ID: 18474968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic approach. New study looks at what drives top performance in clinical quality, efficiency at systems.
    Wilson L
    Mod Healthc; 2009 Aug; 39(32):26-8. PubMed ID: 19714847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Leveraging technology for research.
    Vlasses F; Malliaris M; Androwich I; Caspers B; Dominiak M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():692-6. PubMed ID: 19592930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.