103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18310753)
1. Birmingham hip resurfacing: is acetabular bone conserved?
Moonot P; Singh PJ; Cronin MD; Kalairajah YE; Kavanagh TG; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Mar; 90(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 18310753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement.
Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Girard J; Roy AG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 16877595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty.
Loughead JM; Starks I; Chesney D; Matthews JN; McCaskie AW; Holland JP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 16365116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum, femoral neck and femoral shaft, after hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: two-year results from a randomised study.
Penny JO; Brixen K; Varmarken JE; Ovesen O; Overgaard S
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1036-44. PubMed ID: 22844043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Treatment of dysplastic acetabulum using total hip arthroplasty: our intermediate-term results].
Cichý Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Oct; 73(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 17140516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of total hip replacement in obese and non-obese patients at 10- to 18-years.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Oct; 88(10):1286-92. PubMed ID: 17012415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
Brennan SA; Harty JA; Gormley C; O'Rourke SK
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 19398792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing.
Matthies A; Underwood R; Cann P; Ilo K; Nawaz Z; Skinner J; Hart AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 21357950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.
Su EP; Sheehan M; Su SL
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 19056234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of acetabulum reinforcement ring for reconstructing acetabular defects in artificial hip replacement].
Han W; Zhang H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 23(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19275103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties.
Langton DJ; Sprowson AP; Joyce TJ; Reed M; Carluke I; Partington P; Nargol AV
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Oct; 91(10):1287-95. PubMed ID: 19794161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intermediate-term results after uncemented total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Ermiş MN; Dilaveroğlu B; Erçeltik O; Tuhanioğlu U; Karakaş ES; Durakbaşa MO
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2010 Apr; 21(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 20302556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Total hip arthroplasty with uncemented cup and femoral head autografts for coxarthrosis due to dysplasia].
Wu LD; Xiong Y; Yan SG; Yang QS; He RX; Wang QH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 42(16):1006-9. PubMed ID: 15363240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty. A review of 10 retrieved components.
Witzleb WC; Hanisch U; Ziegler J; Guenther KP
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):951-6. PubMed ID: 18757168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The removal of acetabular bone in hip resurfacing and cementless total hip replacement: a comparison using the ratio of the size of the acetabular component to the diameter of the native femoral head.
Cross MB; Dolan MM; Sidhu GS; Nguyen J; Mayman DJ; Su EP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Oct; 94(10):1339-43. PubMed ID: 23015557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation.
Kim YH; Yoon SH; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Feb; 89(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 17322430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Acetabular revision by using uncemented cup and impacted morselized allografts].
Lian Y; Cho Y; Zhao C; Liu X; Pan S; Wang K; Li W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1062-6. PubMed ID: 19817289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total hip replacement for acetabular fractures. Results in 121 patients operated between 1983 and 2003.
Sermon A; Broos P; Vanderschot P
Injury; 2008 Aug; 39(8):914-21. PubMed ID: 18599057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure.
Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision of the well fixed Birmingham Hip Resurfacing acetabular component--results using a novel device.
Sandiford NA; Muirhead-Allwood S; Skinner J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Feb; 78(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 22523927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
