These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18310753)

  • 21. Long term results of the Corin C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients.
    Raj D; Jaiswal PK; Sharma BL; Fergusson CM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1391-5. PubMed ID: 18176810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of explanted Articular Surface Replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing components.
    Underwood R; Matthies A; Cann P; Skinner JA; Hart AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1169-77. PubMed ID: 21911526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Acetabular component centralization in total hip arthroplasty for acetabular dysplasia].
    Shi ZC; Li ZR; Sun W
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 42(23):1412-5. PubMed ID: 15733451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Metal-backed acetabular components with conventional polyethylene: a review of 9113 primary components with a follow-up of 20 years.
    Hallan G; Dybvik E; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Feb; 92(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 20130308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: A prospective randomised controlled study.
    Smolders JM; Hol A; Rijnders T; van Susante JL
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1509-14. PubMed ID: 21037344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty].
    Yang B; Lin J; Weng XS; Jin J; Zhao Q; Qiu GX
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(12):920-3. PubMed ID: 19781247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study.
    Hing CB; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Bailey M; Back DL; Shimmin AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17785738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?
    Naal FD; Kain MS; Hersche O; Munzinger U; Leunig M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):923-8. PubMed ID: 19142691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Cemented and Bone Ingrowth Fixation Methods in Hip Resurfacing for Osteonecrosis.
    O'Leary RJ; Gaillard MD; Gross TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):437-446. PubMed ID: 27593730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefits of thin-shelled acetabular components for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Le Duff MJ; Wang CT; Wisk LE; Takamura KB; Amstutz HC
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1665-70. PubMed ID: 20973065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Eswaramoorthy VK; Biant LC; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Nov; 91(11):1454-8. PubMed ID: 19880889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Femoral head viability after Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty: assessment with use of [18F] fluoride positron emission tomography.
    Forrest N; Welch A; Murray AD; Schweiger L; Hutchison J; Ashcroft GP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():84-9. PubMed ID: 17079372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases.
    Shimmin AJ; Back D
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Apr; 87(4):463-4. PubMed ID: 15795193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement.
    Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; Taylor A; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Jul; 96-B(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 24986939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spontaneous recurrent dislocation after primary Birmingham hip resurfacing: a rare complication in a 44-year-old man.
    Nall A; Robin J
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):658.e23-7. PubMed ID: 19464846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distances between bony landmarks and adjacent nerves: anatomical factors that may influence retractor placement in total hip replacement surgery.
    Wang TI; Chen HY; Tsai CH; Hsu HC; Lin TL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Mar; 11():31. PubMed ID: 26984637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach.
    McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Pynsent PB; Pradhan C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Dec; 441():91-8. PubMed ID: 16330990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The trainer, the trainee and the surgeons' assistant: clinical outcomes following total hip replacement.
    Palan J; Gulati A; Andrew JG; Murray DW; Beard DJ;
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jul; 91(7):928-34. PubMed ID: 19567859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preoperative digital templating of Birmingham hip resurfacing.
    Konan S; Rayan F; Meermans G; Geurts J; Haddad FS
    Hip Int; 2010; 20(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 20235073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.