BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18311020)

  • 1. [Comparison of basic imaging properties for digital radiographic systems based on a direct conversion type of flat panel detector].
    Sakai S; Katayama R; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect on image data resampling in evaluation of the basic imaging properties for a digital radiographic system based on a flat panel detector].
    Katayama R; Sakai S; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Takada K; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul; 63(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 17917336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
    Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Investigation of the accurate measurement of the basic imaging properties for the digital radiographic system based on flat panel detector].
    Katayama R; Sakai S; Sakaguchi T; Maeda T; Takada K; Hayabuchi N; Morishita J
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jul; 64(7):877-8. PubMed ID: 18719306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M; Kishimoto K; Tanaka K; Oota K; Ienaga A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
    Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
    Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Correlation between basic imaging properties and subjective evaluations of two digital radiographic X-ray systems based on direct-conversion flat panel detector].
    Sakaguchi T; Katayama R; Morishita J; Sakai S; Kuroki H; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1457-66. PubMed ID: 21099176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
    Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
    Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
    Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.