These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18311524)
1. Best interests: puzzles and plausible solutions at the end of life. Woods S Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 18311524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-voluntary passive euthanasia: the social consequences of euphemisms. Sayers GM Eur J Health Law; 2007 Nov; 14(3):221-40. PubMed ID: 18229760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Best interests, public interest, and the power of the medical profession. Coggon J Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 18642085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Best interests and pragmatism. McGuinness S Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):208-18. PubMed ID: 18679802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Best interests, the power of the medical profession, and the power of the judiciary. Quigley M Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 18679803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach. Inwald D Arch Dis Child; 2008 Mar; 93(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 17932122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment--from the bioethical and legal viewpoints]. Minooka M; Inaba K Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2006 Dec; 33 Suppl 2():267-9. PubMed ID: 17469356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should HECs assess whether 'clear and convincing evidence' standards have been met before recommending the discontinuation of life support, including nutrition and fluids? Point and counterpoint. Weber LJ; Mahowald MB HEC Forum; 1991; 3(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 10115141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice]. Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Peters PG Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision-making at the end-of-life and the incompetent patient: a comparative approach. Halliday S; Witteck L Med Law; 2003; 22(3):533-42. PubMed ID: 14626885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Charting a course through difficult legislative waters: tribunal decisions on life-sustaining measures. Willmott L; White B J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 15957587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient's best interests: Australian judicial deliberations. Willmott L; White B; Smith MK; Wilkinson DJ Med J Aust; 2014 Nov; 201(9):545-7. PubMed ID: 25358584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autonomy and the demented self. Dworkin R Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):4-16. PubMed ID: 11649885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Being Ms B: B, autonomy and the nature of legal regulation. Morgan D; Veitch K Syd Law Rev; 2004 Mar; 26(1):107-30. PubMed ID: 16485366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]