BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18312885)

  • 1. The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Mar; 138(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 18312885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
    Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality of life after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults].
    Liu B; Chen XQ; Kong Y; Li YX; Mo LY; Zheng J; Liu S; Chen ZS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 88(22):1550-2. PubMed ID: 18956638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up.
    Damen GW; Beynon AJ; Krabbe PF; Mulder JJ; Mylanus EA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 136(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 17418258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients.
    Lenarz M; Sönmez H; Joseph G; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1361-5. PubMed ID: 22539093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of technological advances on cochlear implant performance in adults.
    Lenarz M; Joseph G; Sönmez H; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2634-40. PubMed ID: 22109764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in adults with prelingual deafness.
    Klop WM; Briaire JJ; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1982-7. PubMed ID: 17767086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
    Chan V; Tong M; Yue V; Wong T; Leung E; Yuen K; van Hasselt A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults.
    Francis HW; Chee N; Yeagle J; Cheng A; Niparko JK
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Aug; 112(8 Pt 1):1482-8. PubMed ID: 12172266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
    Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of early cochlear implantation on the linguistic development of the deaf child.
    Artières F; Vieu A; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):736-42. PubMed ID: 19638938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health-related quality of life outcomes following adult cochlear implantation: A prospective cohort study.
    Sladen DP; Peterson A; Schmitt M; Olund A; Teece K; Dowling B; DeJong M; Breneman A; Beatty CW; Carlson ML; Neff BA; Hughes-Borst B; Driscoll CL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 May; 18(3):130-135. PubMed ID: 28248612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a right cochlear implant advantage?
    Henkin Y; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Migirov L; Kronenberg J; Kishon-Rabin L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 18401283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implant surgery in patients more than seventy-nine years old.
    Eshraghi AA; Rodriguez M; Balkany TJ; Telischi FF; Angeli S; Hodges AV; Adil E
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Jun; 119(6):1180-3. PubMed ID: 19301411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users.
    Hochmair-Desoyer I; Schulz E; Moser L; Schmidt M
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S83. PubMed ID: 9391610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implantation has a positive influence on quality of life, tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity.
    Olze H; Szczepek AJ; Haupt H; Förster U; Zirke N; Gräbel S; Mazurek B
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Oct; 121(10):2220-7. PubMed ID: 21898434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress.
    Olze H; Gräbel S; Förster U; Zirke N; Huhnd LE; Haupt H; Mazurek B
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jan; 122(1):196-203. PubMed ID: 21997855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.