These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18312886)

  • 21. Music mixing preferences of cochlear implant recipients: a pilot study.
    Buyens W; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 24471410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Quality of life after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults].
    Liu B; Chen XQ; Kong Y; Li YX; Mo LY; Zheng J; Liu S; Chen ZS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 88(22):1550-2. PubMed ID: 18956638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Moran M; Rousset A; Looi V
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S57-63. PubMed ID: 27045837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What Does Music Sound Like for a Cochlear Implant User?
    Jiam NT; Caldwell MT; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e240-e247. PubMed ID: 28806333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
    Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):59S-61S. PubMed ID: 17496649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
    Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Emotional response to music by postlingually-deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):879-81. PubMed ID: 23285951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study.
    Hutter E; Argstatter H; Grapp M; Plinkert PK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S13-21. PubMed ID: 26047068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recognition of music and melody in patients with cochlear implants, using a new programming approach for frequency assignment.
    Falcón-González JC; Borkoski-Barreiro S; Limiñana-Cañal JM; Ramos-Macías A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2014; 65(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 24890686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
    Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Self-reported music perception is related to quality of life and self-reported hearing abilities in cochlear implant users.
    Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34470590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.
    Gfeller K; Lansing CR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 1956198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A study on the normal values of musical sounds in cochlear implants test battery].
    Dong R; Wang S; Zhou Y; Qi B; Chen X; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 27(13):712-6. PubMed ID: 24073580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.