These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1831289)

  • 1. Users' responses to assistive devices for physical disability.
    Brooks NA
    Soc Sci Med; 1991; 32(12):1417-24. PubMed ID: 1831289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Users' satisfaction and experiences in using assistive devices distributed by a rehabilitation centre in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.
    Nuri RP; Xu X; Aldersey HM
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):868-877. PubMed ID: 36215415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings.
    Huang IC; Sugden D; Beveridge S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Mar; 4(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 19253098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes towards rehabilitation needs and support from assistive technology and the social environment among elderly people with disability.
    Lilja M; Bergh A; Johansson L; Nygård L
    Occup Ther Int; 2003; 10(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 12830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes faced by young adults using assistive technology as depicted through photovoice.
    Ripat J; Woodgate RL; Bennett L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 30776928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of technology by people with physical disabilities in Australia.
    Pell SD; Gillies RM; Carss M
    Disabil Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 21(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 9990489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction of assistive devices: home nurses' practices and beliefs.
    Roelands M; Van Oost P; Depoorter AM; Buysse A; Stevens V
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 16553704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities.
    Kaye HS; Yeager P; Reed M
    Assist Technol; 2008; 20(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 19160906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it.
    Sugawara AT; Ramos VD; Alfieri FM; Battistella LR
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):716-723. PubMed ID: 29334475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assistive technology use and unmet need in Canada.
    Berardi A; Smith EM; Miller WC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Nov; 16(8):851-856. PubMed ID: 32207634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of assistive technology devices in fostering the participation and learning of students with visual impairment in higher education institutions in Tanzania.
    Kisanga SE; Kisanga DH
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Oct; 17(7):791-800. PubMed ID: 32951491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current state and conceptual framework of assistive technology provision in Saudi Arabia.
    Alqahtani S; Cooper R; Cooper RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Nov; 18(8):1357-1363. PubMed ID: 34847331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Social Implementation Education for Assistive Device Engineers at NIT (KOSEN) through the Development of a Digital Reading Device for the Visually Impaired.
    Kiyota K; Ishibashi T; Shimakawa M; Ito K
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment.
    Dos Santos ADP; Ferrari ALM; Medola FO; Sandnes FE
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Feb; 17(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 32501732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-related assistive technology: satisfaction and experiences among users with disabilities.
    Burton M; Nieuwenhuijsen ER; Epstein MJ
    Assist Technol; 2008; 20(2):99-106; quiz 84-5. PubMed ID: 18646432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pruning a decision tree for selecting computer-related assistive devices for people with disabilities.
    Chi CF; Tseng LK; Jang Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jul; 20(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 22552588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation.
    Gudjonsdottir B; Gudmundsdottir SB
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 18(6):722-729. PubMed ID: 34102088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of payment for assistive technology: findings from a national survey of persons with disabilities.
    Carlson D; Ehrlich N
    Assist Technol; 2006; 18(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16796243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assistive device utilization among disabled elderly in China: A cross-sectional study.
    Tang R; Zhang X; Yan S; Guan B; Li Y; Luo Q; Lai R; Wan H; Yang Y; Zeng L
    Public Health Nurs; 2024; 41(4):653-663. PubMed ID: 38652371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Mediating Effect of Information and Communication Technology Usages on the Nexus Between Assistive Technology and Quality of Life Among People with Communication Disability.
    Ali MA; Alam K; Taylor B
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2020 May; 23(5):338-345. PubMed ID: 32320278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.