These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18312960)

  • 21. Turf wars in radiology: the past, present, and future importance of training standards in imaging.
    Rao VM; Levin DC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):602-6. PubMed ID: 17411885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The ACR appropriateness criteria: translation to practice and research.
    Sistrom CL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17411762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.
    Lee R; Cohen MD; Jennings GS
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 16428061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria on conservative surgery and radiation: stages I and II breast carcinoma.
    White JR; Halberg FE; Rabinovitch R; Green S; Haffty BG; Solin LJ; Strom EA; Taylor ME; Edge SB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):701-13. PubMed ID: 18514949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Experiences in the Netherlands].
    Van Waes P; Reerink E
    J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 76(11):1018-19. PubMed ID: 8594179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.
    Goolsby MJ
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2001 Jul; 13(7):293-6. PubMed ID: 11930601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Standards are adopted by JRCERT.
    Fay M
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 8726990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relational data model for the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.
    Sistrom CL; Honeyman JC
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 12415465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Practice alert for the perioperative management of patients with coronary artery stents: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jan; 110(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 19104165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A proposed approach for quantitative benefit-risk assessment in diagnostic radiology guideline development: the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Example.
    Agapova M; Bresnahan BB; Higashi M; Kessler L; Garrison LP; Devine B
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 27762080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eminence-based guidelines: a quality assessment of the second Joint British Societies' guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
    Minhas R
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1137-44. PubMed ID: 17386061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerized patient management.
    Perry E
    Adm Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 15(6):21-2. PubMed ID: 10159367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. Will they be useful for us?
    Bode FR; Cascade PN
    Chest; 1996 Oct; 110(4):869-71. PubMed ID: 8874234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RIS (radiology information systems) selection criteria: Part 2.
    Boehme J; Choplin R
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Oct; 9(10):69-71. PubMed ID: 10107647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: Advancing Evidence-Based Imaging Practice.
    Subramaniam RM; Kurth DA; Waldrip CA; Rybicki FJ
    Semin Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 49(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 30819396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Good scientific practice--ethics in science and research: Guidelines of the Medical Faculty of the Vienna University].
    Osterreichischen Röntgengesellschaft
    Rofo; 2003 May; 175(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 12816076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Development of guidelines for medical procedures; relationship between goal, method and effect].
    Kaasenbrood AJ; Klazinga NS
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Jul; 138(31):1560-4. PubMed ID: 8072567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Utility of medical data registries.
    Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1191. PubMed ID: 25444071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Added Value of the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System.
    Yee J; Chang KJ; Dachman AH; Kim DH; McFarland EG; Pickhardt PJ; Cash BD; Bruining DH; Zalis ME
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 27260486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Guidelines for hospital privileges in vascular surgery: an update by an ad hoc committee of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and the Society for Vascular Surgery.
    Moore WS; Clagett GP; Veith FJ; Moneta GL; Webster MW; Stanley JC; Ouriel K; Andros G; Calligaro KD; Kent KC; ;
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Dec; 36(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 12469065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.